Israel’s Violence Against Separation Wall Protests: Along the Road of STATE TERRORISM

7 Jan


One of the flashpoints in Occupied Palestine in recent years has involved non-violent weekly protests against continued Israeli construction of a separation wall extending throughout the whole of the West Bank. A particularly active site for these protests has been the village of Bi’lin near the city of Ramallah, and it is here where the Israeli penchant to use deadly force to disrupt nonviolent demonstrations raises deep legal and moral concerns. These concerns are accentuated when it is realized that way back in 2004 the International Court of Justice (the highest judicial body in the UN System) in a rare near unanimous ruling declared the construction of the wall on occupied Palestinian territory to be unlawful, and reached findings ordering Israel to dismantle the wall and compensate Palestinians for the harm done. Israel has defied this ruling, and so the wall remains, and work continues on segments yet to be completed.


It is against this background that the world should take note of the shocking death of Jawaher Abu Rahma on the first day of 2011 as a result of suffocation resulting from tear gas inhalation while not even being part of the Bi’lin demonstration. Witnesses confirm that she was standing above the actual demonstration as an interested spectator. It was a large year end demonstration that included the participation of 350 Israeli and international activists. There was no excuse for the use of such a harsh method of disrupting a protest against a feature of the occupation that had been pronounced to be unlawful by an authoritative international body. As it happens the brother of Ms. Rahman had been killed a few months earlier by a tear gas canister fired with a high velocity from a close range. And there are many other reports of casualties caused by Israel’s extreme methods of crowd control. International activists have also been injured and harshly detained in the past, including the Irish Nobel Peace Laureate, Mairead Maguire. Together these deaths exhibit a general unacceptable Israeli disposition to use excessive force against Palestinians living under occupation. Just a day later an unarmed young Palestinian, Ahmed Maslamany, peacefully on his way to work was shot to death at a West Bank checkpoint because he failed to follow an instruction given in Hebrew, a language he did not understand.


When this lethal violence is directed against unarmed civilians seeking to uphold fundamental rights to land, routine mobility, and self-determination  it dramatizes just how lawless a state Israel has become and how justifiable and necessary is the growing world campaign of delegitimation centered upon the boycott, disvestment, and sanctions movement (BDS). Each instance of Israeli excessive and criminal violence inflicts suffering on innocent Palestinian civilians, but it also is a form of martyrdom in the nonviolent Legitimacy War that the Palestinians have been waging within Palestine and on the symbolic global battlefields of world public opinion with growing success.

Israel knows very well how to control unruly crowds with a minimum of violence. It has demonstrated this frequently by the way it gently deals, if it deals at all, with a variety of settler demonstrations that pose far greater threats to social peace than do these anti-wall demonstrations. It is impossible to separate this excessive use of force by Israel on the ground against Palestinians from the indiscriminate use of force against civilians in Israel’s larger occupation policy, as illustrated by the cruel punitive blockade that has been imposed on the people of Gaza for more than three years and by the criminal manner in which carried out attacks for three weeks on the defenseless population in Gaza exactly two years ago. Is it not time for the international community to step in and offer this long vulnerable Palestinian population protection against Israeli violence?

.

Underneath Israel’s reliance on excessive force as a matter of strategic doctrine are thinly disguised racist ideas: Israeli lives are worth many times the value of Palestinian lives and Palestinians, like all Arabs, only understand the language of force (an essentially genocidal idea launched influentially years ago in a notorious book The Arab Mind by Raphael Patai published in 1973. It is also part of a punitive approach to the occupation, especially in Gaza, where WikiLeaks cables confirm what was long suspected: “As part of their overall embargo plan against Gaza, Israeli officials have confirmed to [U.S, Embassy economic officers] on multiple occasions that they intend to keep the Gaza economy on the brink of collapse without quite pushing it over the edge.” (cable reported on Jan. 5, 2011, Norwegian daily) Then Prime Minister Ehud Olmert in a speech delivered in January 2008 said of the blockade: “We will not harm the supply of food for children, medecine for those who need it and fuel to save lives..But there is no justification for demanding we allow residents of Gaza to live normal live while shells and rockets are fired from their streets and courtyards (at southern Israel).”

This is a clear confession of collective punishment of a civilian population by Israel’s political leader at the time, violating the unconditional prohibition of Article 33 of the Fourth Geneva Convention. Such gross criminality should subject Israeli political leaders to international mechanisms designed to impose accountability on individuals responsible for the commission of crimes against humanity. It also makes it evident that the blockade is punitive, not responsive to cross-border violence that incidentally at all times was far more destructive of Palestinian lives and property than that of Israelis. Beyond this, the Hamas leadership in Gaza had since its election repeatedly attempted to establish a ceasefire along its border, which when agreed upon with the help of Egypt reduced casualties on both sides to almost zero after being establishment in mid-2008. This ceasefire was provocatively disrupted by Israel on November 5, 2008 to set the stage for launching of the massive attacks on Gaza, lasting for three weeks after being initiated on December 27th of 2008.

In that war, if such a one-sided conflict should be so described, the criminality of the tactics relied upon by the Israeli Defense Forces has been abundantly documented by The Goldstone Report, by a comprehensive fact-finding mission headed by John Dugard under the auspices of the Arab League, and by detailed reports issued by Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch. There is no reasonable basis for any longer doubting the substance of the allegations of criminality associated with those three weeks of all out attacks on the people and civilian infrastructure, including UN schools and buildings.

The Goldstone Report correctly noted that the overall impression left by the attacks was an extension of the Dahiya Doctrine attributed to an Israeli general during the Lebanon War 2006 in which the Israeli destruction from the air of a district in South Beirut was a deliberately excessive response, at the expense of civilian society, because of being an alleged Hezbollah stronghold, and in response to a border incident in which ten Israeli soldiers lost their lives in an encounter with Hezbollah combatants. The 2009 Goldstone report quoted IDF Northern Command Chief Gadi Eisenkot, who said, “What happened in the Dahiya quarter of Beirut in 2006 will happen in every village from which Israel is fired on. We will apply disproportionate force on it and cause great damage and destruction there. From our standpoint, these are not civilian villages, they are military bases. [...] This is not a recommendation. This is a plan. And it has been approved.” In effect, the civilian infrastructure of adversaries such as Hamas or Hezbollah are treated as permissible military targets, which is not only an overt violation of the most elementary norms of the law of war and of universal morality, but an avowal of a doctrine of violence that needs to be called by its proper name: STATE TERRORISM.

We have reached a stage where the oppressiveness of the Israeli occupation, extending now for more than 43 years and maintained in multiple daily violations of international humanitarian law.  In its essence and by design the Israeli occupation of the West Bank, East Jerusalem, and the Gaza Strip should be understood and condemned as STATE TERRORISM as exhibited both in structure and practice.

About these ads

14 Responses to “Israel’s Violence Against Separation Wall Protests: Along the Road of STATE TERRORISM”

  1. Jean-Luc Karleskind January 9, 2011 at 12:16 pm #

    Dear Richard,’
    You write “peaceful” demonstration referring to the Bilin demomstrations. I believe “non-violent” would be more correct. Indeed, peaceful carries the idea of putting peace as the overall value refusing the conflict. To my knowledge, the Bi’lin activists describe their struggle as “non-violent”. This relates to Gandhi’s struggle in South Africa and India. In essence, Gandhi says that non-violence can defeat violence when struggling for truth and justice. Also when in inferiority in means of violence, non-violence is the only weapon that can win. This is what some Palestinians have understood after decades of armed struggle.

    • Richard Falk January 10, 2011 at 7:22 am #

      Dear Jean-Luc: Thanks for pointing this out, and I was wrong to use ‘peaceful’ and ‘non-violent’ interchangeably. You are quite right, and I will edit my blog accordingly, which is one of the virtues of this mode of communication. It can be improved by interaction!

  2. Latricia Charpia January 14, 2011 at 4:09 pm #

    Wow, amazing blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you make blogging look easy.

    • Richard Falk January 14, 2011 at 5:40 pm #

      Thanks for the affirming words, but not easy..I am novice, never blogged before my 80th birthday!

  3. Gideon January 19, 2011 at 1:22 pm #

    Don’t you feel like a chump when it turned out that the actual cause of her death was her leukemia? Kinda makes your whole article, erm, pointless.
    Any special reason that you haven’t issued a retraction to your lies above, or is it much easier to spew lies and keep your head buried in the sand.
    It is actually quite sad and but not really surprising to see that you are lacking integrity.
    Regarding the baseless allegations of state terrorism, you and I both know that is nonsense, Israel acts in self defense only.
    Regarding some other, probably intentional mistakes in your article, Dahia was a Hezbollah stronghold, you inserted I gather in error, the word alleged.
    Regarding the bombing and destroa ying of civilian infrastructure used by terrorists, well then its no longer civilian is it?
    If a Mosque is used to store ammunition, then its no longer a mosque, its an ammunition dump. The only difference between Israel and any other country in the world, is that Israel will do whatever it can not to attack the mosque aka ammunition dump.

    • Richard Falk January 19, 2011 at 3:40 pm #

      My facts are different. Please direct me to your sources.

  4. Propecia January 22, 2011 at 6:14 pm #

    Youre so cool! I dont suppose Ive learn anything like this before. So nice to search out someone with some authentic thoughts on this subject. realy thank you for beginning this up. this web site is something that’s wanted on the internet, somebody with a little bit originality. useful job for bringing something new to the internet!

  5. Cialis January 24, 2011 at 4:25 am #

    I discovered your blog site on google and verify a few of your early posts. Continue to keep up the superb operate. I just additional up your RSS feed to my MSN News Reader. In search of ahead to studying more from you later on!…

  6. melatrol January 26, 2011 at 4:45 am #

    This is the fitting blog for anybody who wants to search out out about this topic. You notice so much its almost hard to argue with you (not that I really would need…HaHa). You positively put a new spin on a subject thats been written about for years. Great stuff, just nice!

    • Richard Falk January 26, 2011 at 6:09 pm #

      I am encouraged by your comment, and appreciative.

  7. levitra January 26, 2011 at 7:38 pm #

    I’m often to blogging and i actually appreciate your content. The article has actually peaks my interest. I’m going to bookmark your site and maintain checking for new information.

  8. levitra January 28, 2011 at 3:05 am #

    It’s hard to search out educated folks on this subject, but you sound like you know what you’re talking about! Thanks

  9. Cialis February 1, 2011 at 2:32 pm #

    Aw, this was a very nice post. In concept I wish to put in writing like this moreover – taking time and actual effort to make a very good article… however what can I say… I procrastinate alot and on no account appear to get one thing done.

  10. antique vase April 29, 2011 at 2:12 pm #

    There are certainly a lot of details like that to take into consideration. That is a great point to bring up. I offer the thoughts above as general inspiration but clearly there are questions like the one you bring up where the most important thing will be working in honest good faith. I don?t know if best practices have emerged around things like that, but I am sure that your job is clearly identified as a fair game.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 10,037 other followers

%d bloggers like this: