Tag Archives: John Dugard
Richard Falk
Richard Falk is an international law and international relations scholar who taught at Princeton University for forty years. Since 2002 he has lived in Santa Barbara, California, and taught at the local campus of the University of California in Global and International Studies and since 2005 chaired the Board of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation. He initiated this blog partly in celebration of his 80th birthday.
Archives
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
Tags
AKP
anti-Semitism
apartheid
Balfour Declaration
Barack Obama
BDS
Climate change
Cold War
Democracy
diplomacy
Donald Trump
Egypt
Erdogan
European Union
Gaza
Gaza Strip
geopolitics
George W. Bush
Gilad Shalit
Hamas
Hilary Clinton
Hiroshima
Holocaust
Hosni Mubarak
Human rights
International Court of Justice
International Criminal Court
international law
Iran
Iraq
Iraq War
ISIS
Israel
Israel-Palestine
Israel/Palestine
Japan
Jerusalem
Libya
Middle East
militarism
NATO
Netanyahu
New York Times
Nobel Peace Prize
Nuclear disarmament
nuclear weapons
Obama
Palestine
Palestinian people
Palestinian prisoners in Israel
Palestinian territories
peace process
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan
revolution
Richard Falk
Russia
Saudi Arabia
Snowden
Soviet Union
Syria
Tel Aviv
Terrorism
Trump
Turkey
UN
United Nations
United Nations Security Council
United States
Vietnam
Vietnam War
war crimes
Washington
West Bank
World War II
Zionism
Recent Posts
Categories
- 'Abnormal' Japan
- 'Fortress World'
- 'Normal' Japan
- 'Operation Protective Edge'
- 'Peace Process'
- 'Voluntary' International Law
- (un)civility
- 13 Demands
- 1915 Genocide
- 1948 War of Independence
- 1967 War
- 9/11 Attacks
- A Quiet Heart
- A remebrance
- Abbas
- Abdullah Gul
- Abraham Center for Middle East Peace
- academic freedom
- acadmic freedom
- accountability
- Adala Urgent Appeal
- Administrative Detention
- Africa
- aggression
- Ahed Tamimi
- Ahmet Davutoğlu
- AKP
- Al Aqsa Mosque
- al-Shayat Airfield
- Alfred Nobel
- Algeria
- Ali Mazrui
- alliance
- Altamont Speedway Concert
- Alternative Facts
- America
- America as republic
- American elections
- American Embassy Seuzure
- American foreign policy
- American presidential campaign
- American presidential election
- American racism
- American Sniper
- AMEXIT
- Amos Oz
- and Opponents
- Anit-BDS Summit
- anit-Semitism
- Anti-colonialism
- anti-Semitism
- anti-Semitism
- Anti-Zionism UN Resolution
- Antonina Zabinski
- apartheid
- Apartheid Convention
- Apology
- Aquino
- Arab Spring
- Armenia
- Armenian community
- Armenian Genocide
- arms control
- arms sales
- Article 9
- aspirational democracy
- asymmetric warfare
- Ataturk
- atomic attacks
- atomic bomb
- Audre Lorde
- Auschwitz
- authoritarianism
- autocracy
- Ayatollah Khomeini
- Ayelet Shaked
- Azopt
- Balfour Declaration
- Ban KI-moon
- BAN Treaty
- Barack Obama
- Bashar el-Assad
- Basher al Assad
- BBC
- BDS
- BDS Campaign
- BDS-Bashing
- Belgium
- Ben Ali Saleh
- Benjiman Netanyahu
- Bernie Sanders
- Berrigan Brothers
- Bibi Netanyahu
- Bill Clinton
- Bill Cosby
- Binali Yildirim
- binary thinking
- Biopolitical Moment
- blog boundaries
- blog civility
- blog comments
- Blog ethics
- Bob Kerrie
- book burning
- BREXIT
- British Mandate
- Brzezinski
- Bush family
- Caeser Group
- Cambodia
- campaign fundraising
- capital punishment
- Capitalism
- Carl Schmitt
- Caterpillar
- Catholicism
- ceasefire
- Chaim Weizman
- charismatic resilience
- Charles Blow
- Charlie Hebdo
- Charlottesville
- Chas Freeman
- Chemical Weapons
- Cherif Chouachi
- Chernobyl
- child prisoners
- China
- CHP
- Christmas
- Christopher Kennedy
- citizen pilgrim
- citizenship
- City of
- citzenship
- civil disobedience
- civil society
- Civil Society Discourse
- civil society tribunals
- civility
- Claudia Rankine
- Clean Break
- Climate Change
- climate denial
- climate justice
- Clinton
- Clinton Defeat
- Clinton's belligerence
- Cold War
- collective punishment
- collective security
- Collective Self-Defense
- Colombia Peace Process
- Colonial Legacies
- colonialism
- Comment Guidelines
- Commentary
- Complexity
- Conservative Republicans
- Constitutional issues
- consumerism
- contextual and configurative analysis
- Copenhagen failure
- Corporate responsibility
- cosmic consciousness
- cosmopolitanism
- Council of Foreign Relations
- counter-terrorism
- Counterinsurgency Tactics
- counterinsurgency warfare
- Counterinsurgency Wars
- Counterrevolution
- counterterrorism
- Coup aftermath
- Coup attempt
- Cour failure
- Craig Hicks
- crime of apartheid
- crime or war
- Crimea
- Crimes against Humanity
- Crimes of State
- Criminal Accountability
- Criminal Law
- Criminality
- Cruz
- Cuban Revolution
- cultural imagination
- cultural war of aggression
- culture of violence
- cyber attacks
- Dan Ellsberg
- Daniel Berrigan
- Daniel Ellsberg
- Daniel Pipes
- Dany Danon
- Dautoglu
- David Krieger
- Davutoglu
- Dayan Jayatilleka
- debate
- decline of democracy
- Defamation
- Defamatory Comments
- demagogue
- demilitarization
- democracy
- democratic elections
- Democratic Paarty
- Democratic Party
- Democratic Party foreign policy
- Demographic Bomb
- denuclearization
- Depolarization
- Derrida
- deterrence
- dialogic humility
- dialogue
- Dieudonne
- digital age
- Digital Etiquette
- Digital Home
- Digital India
- Diploamacy
- diplomacy
- diplomatic initiative
- Diplomatic Protocol
- dipomacy
- disarmament
- discourse
- dispossession
- Donald Trump
- double standards
- Douma CW attack
- drone warfare
- drones
- drug prices
- dystopia
- early Christianity
- Ebrahim Yazdi
- eco-humanism
- eco-insurgency
- eco-politics
- ecological alienation
- Ecological Civilization
- ecological collapse
- Ecological Ethos
- ecological jurisprudence
- ecology
- Economic embargo
- education
- educational reform
- Edward Said
- Edward Snowden
- Effective Control
- Egypt
- Egypt (2011) (2013)
- Electoral College
- electoral politics
- Elizabeth McAlister
- ending apartheid
- ending occupation
- Enlightenment
- environmment
- Eqbal Ahmed
- Erdogan
- ESCWA
- ESCWA Report
- espionage
- Ethics of Apology
- Ethno-nationalist Moment
- ethnocracy
- ethnographhic moment
- Euromed
- Europe
- European statecraft
- European Union
- European Unity
- failed coup
- False Certainty
- False Consciousness
- fanaticism
- fascism
- Father Miguel D'Escoto
- Fethullah Gulen
- FETO
- Fetullah extradition
- Fetullah Gulen
- Fidel
- Fidel Castro
- FIFA
- FIFA and Palestinian Football
- Force-feedomg
- foreign military bases
- forgiveness
- Fouad Ajami
- France and the United States
- Francis Fukuyama
- Fred Skolnik
- Fredrik Heffermehl
- freedom of expression
- Fukashima Daiichi
- Fukushima
- Fulbright Vietnam University
- funding terrrorism
- future generations
- Gandhi
- Gaza
- Gaza
- Gaza occupation
- Gaza oppressi
- General Yair Golan
- genocide
- Genocide Controversy
- Genocide Convention
- Genocide-duty to prevent
- Geoffrey Darnton
- Geopolitic bersus International Law
- geopolitical laws
- Geopolitical Militarism
- geopolitics
- George H.W. Bush
- George McGovern
- George W. Bush
- Germany
- Gerry Spence
- Gideon Levy
- glaucoma
- Global autocracy
- Global Battlefield
- Global Capital
- global citizen
- global domination project
- Global Governance
- Global Imperial State
- global interest
- global justice
- global leadership
- Global presidency
- global risks
- global security
- Global State
- global warming
- Grand Inquisitor
- Grand Strategy
- Guantanamo
- Gujurat
- Gulf Cooperation Council
- Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)
- Gulf Crisis
- Gulf Crisis of 2014
- Gulf Monarchies
- gun culture
- hacking
- Haider Eid
- Haim Saban
- Hamas
- Hamas Charter
- Hanan Ashrawi
- harmony with nature
- Harrisburg 7
- hasbara
- hate speech
- HDP
- Health
- Heffermehl
- Henry Kissinger
- Henry L. Stimson
- Henry Paulson
- Hersch Lauterpacht
- Hewlett Packard
- hibakusha
- Hilary Clinton
- Hilary Clinton's foreign policy
- Hillary Clinton
- Hiroshima
- Hirosshima
- History
- Hizmet
- Hizmet movement
- Ho Chi Minh
- Holocaust
- House of Commons vote
- Houthis
- human interest
- human interests
- Human Rights
- Human Rights
- Human Rights Council
- Human Rights Watch
- human security
- humanism
- Hunger Strike
- identity
- imagination
- Imelda Marcos
- Implementation
- impunity
- Incitement to Genocide
- inclusiveness
- indefinite detention
- India
- Indian Wells Tennis Tournament
- Insiders v. Outsiders
- internal displacement
- Internation Law
- International & Global Law
- International Chaos
- International Court of Justice
- International Court of Justice (ICJ)
- International Crimes
- International Criminal Court
- International criminal law
- International Day of Solidarity with Palestinian People
- international humanitarian law
- international law
- international law
- international lawyers
- International Liberal Order
- International reputation
- intervention
- interview
- Iran
- Iran (1979)
- Iran diplomacy
- Iran Nuclear Agreement
- Iran nuclear diplomacy
- Iran Nuclear Program
- Iran's nuclear program
- Iranian democracy
- Iraq occupation
- Iraq War
- Ireland
- ISIS
- Islamophobia
- Israel
- Israel elections
- Israel Palestine
- Israel prisons
- Israel's Arms Industry
- Israel's Obligations under IHL
- Israel-Palestine
- Israel/Palestine
- Israel/Palestine
- Israeli 'Democracy'
- Israeli apartheid
- Israeli assassinations
- Israeli Entitlements
- Israeli impunity
- Israeli jurisprudence
- Israeli Law
- Israeli Lobby
- Israeli one-state
- Israeli One-State Solution
- Israeli one-state unilateralism
- Israeli Prisons
- Israeli Security Establishment
- Israeli soul searching
- Israeli war crimes
- Istanbul
- Italy
- Jacob Mchangama
- Jacques Derrida
- James Douglass
- James Zogby
- Japan
- JCPOA
- Jean Bricmont
- Jeff Halper
- Jeremy Hammond
- Jerusalem
- Jerusalem Resolution
- Jerusalem UN Resolution
- Jewish exceptionalism
- Jewish identity
- Jewish Voices for Peace
- jihadism
- Jill Stein
- John Bolton
- John Ikenberry
- John Kasich
- John Kerry
- John Pilger
- Joint Declaration on International Law
- Joint Statement of Opposition
- Jonathan Pollard
- Joseph Nye
- journalistic ethics
- Juan Manuel Santos
- July 15th
- July 15th Coup Attempt
- justice
- Kader Asmal
- Kellyanne Conway
- Kerry Diplomacy
- Khan Sheikhoun
- Kim Jung-un
- Kissinger
- knowledge
- Kosovo
- Kurdish conflict
- Kurdish Issues
- Kurdish movement
- Kurdish struggle
- Kurdish victory
- Kurds
- Kyoto
- Laos
- Law Enforcement
- Lawfare
- Lawfare Project
- leadership
- leadership crisis
- League of Nations
- Legitimacy
- Legitimacy War
- Legitimacy War
- Legitimacy Wars
- liberal
- Liberal Democrats
- Liberal Zionism
- liberalism
- Libya
- Lidia Yuknavitch
- logic of reciprocity
- lost causes
- luxury
- Macron
- Madrid train bombings
- Mahmoud Abbas
- Makarim Wibisono
- Marco Rubio
- Marcos
- Mario Savio
- Marjorie Cohn
- Marsahll Islands nuclear zero litigation
- Martin Niemoller
- Marwan Barghouti
- Max Blumenthal
- Mazin Qumsiyeh
- media
- meditative intelligence
- Mega-Terorism
- megaterrorism
- memoir
- Memories
- Mendlovitz
- Mental Health
- Mexico
- Michael Moore
- Michael Oren
- Michael Walzer
- Middle East
- Middle East Forum
- Middle East geopolitics
- Middle Easy
- Miguel d'Escoto
- Mika Brzezinski
- Mikhail Gorbachev
- militarism
- military intervention
- military technology
- Mira Regev
- Mission for Growth
- Modernity
- Mohammed Omer
- Money
- Moral Revolution
- Morning 'Joe'
- Motorola Solutioons
- Muslim Brotherhood
- Nagasaki
- Nakba
- Nakba as Process
- Naomi Klein
- NAPF
- Narendra Modi
- national interest
- national liberation
- National Review
- National Security
- national security legislation
- nationalism
- NATO
- Nazi period
- Nebraska
- needs based development
- Neoliberal Capitalism
- neoliberalism
- Netanyahu
- netizenship
- New Anti-Semitism
- New Cold War
- new geopolitics
- New Wars
- new world order
- New York Times
- NGOs
- Nicaragua
- Nikki Haley
- no first use
- No Fly Zone (NFZ)
- Nobel Peace Forum
- Nobel Peace Prize
- Nobel Prize
- Non-intervention
- Non-violent Struggle
- nonproliferation
- nonproliferation
- nonproliferation treaty
- Nonviolence
- Nonviolent Resistance
- normative democracy
- North Carolina murders
- North Korea
- north/south divide
- NPT
- NPT Article IV
- nuclear age
- Nuclear Age Peace Foundation
- Nuclear Ban Treaty
- nuclear civil disobeidence
- Nuclear Disarmament
- Nuclear disarmament
- nuclear education
- Nuclear Famine
- nuclear power
- nuclear securitization
- nuclear war
- Nuclear Weapons
- Nuclear Weapons Policy
- nuclearism
- Nuremberg Human Rights Award 2017
- Nuremberg Judegment
- Nuremberg Judgment
- Nuremberg Laws
- Nuremberg Obligation
- Nuremberg Principles
- Nuremburg
- NY Times
- Obama
- Obama on nuclear policy
- Obama's foreign policy
- Obama's Irvine Commencement Address
- Obstacle to Peace
- occupation
- Occupied Palestine
- oil
- Okinawa
- Old City of Jerusalem
- old geopolitics
- Omar Barghouti
- One-Israel-State-Solution
- One-state
- one-state solution
- Open Letter to Trump
- oppression
- Oppressive Occupation
- Oren Ben-Dor
- Orientalism
- Oslo Approach
- Oslo diplomacy
- Oslo Peace Process
- Oslo Process
- Outlaw State
- P-5
- P5
- P5 +1 Agreement
- Pacification
- Palestine
- Palestine
- Palestine Authority
- Palestine Prisoners
- Palestine statehood
- Palestine/Israel
- Palestinian Authority
- Palestinian children prisoners
- Palestinian people
- Palestinian Self-determination
- Palestinian solidarity
- Palestinian statehood
- Palestinians
- Paris 2015
- Paris Agreement
- Paris Attacks
- Paris Climate Change Agreement
- Paris Preamble
- Partition Resolution
- Partition War
- Patriotism
- Paul Raskin
- peace
- Peace and Justice
- peace journalism
- Peace process
- Peace Talks
- Peace Through Diplomacy
- Pearl Harbor
- Pentagon
- Peres Funeral
- Personal Background
- petropolitics
- Philip Berrigan
- Philippines
- Phyllis Bennis
- Pivot away from Middle East
- Pivot to Asia
- PKK
- Plan B: Colonial Retreat
- Plan C: A Just Peace
- Planetary Realism
- PLO
- Plowshares 8
- Poems
- Poetic Wisdom
- Poetry
- poetry & war
- polarization
- Police Brutality
- Police State
- political community
- Political Community?
- Political correctness
- political extremism
- political fundraising
- political leadership
- political style
- political violence
- Politics of Apology
- Politics of Language
- Pope Francis
- Popular Mobilization
- Popular Vote
- populism
- Populist Representation
- Port Huron Statement
- post-colonial colonialism
- Power as Crime
- Pre-Fascism
- Presbyterian Divestment
- President Erdogan
- Presidential Campaign
- Presidential System
- Primary Campaign
- Princeton University
- procedural democracy
- progressive
- Progressive Populism
- Protection of Holy Sites
- Protective Edge
- public intellectual
- Punitive Peace
- Qaddafi
- Qatar
- QGOs
- R2P Diplomacy
- racialized language
- racism
- Radical Humanism
- Rafael Lemkin
- Ralph Nader
- ran
- Recep Tayyip Erdogan
- reconciliation
- Reflections
- Reform
- refugee law
- regime change
- regional conflict
- Regional Disengagement
- Religion
- religious counterrevolution
- representation
- republican democracy
- Republican Party
- republicanism
- Responsibility to Protect (R2P)
- Reuven Rivlin
- Revolution
- Richard Falk
- Richard Goldstone
- Richard Haass
- Richard Kemp
- Rima Khalaf
- risk management
- Risky Business
- Robert Faurisson
- Robert Kaplan
- Robert O Paxton
- Robin Nisblett
- Roger Cohen
- Rome
- Ronald Reagan
- Rouhani
- rules of the game
- Russell Tribunal
- Russia
- Russian hacking
- Ryōkan
- Sakamoto
- Salmon Rushdie
- Samer Issawi
- Samuel Huntington
- Sanctions
- Sanders' Revolution
- Santa Barbara Fires
- Sarin Gas
- Saudi Arabia
- Saudi Royal Family
- SC Res. 242
- Scientific Consensus
- Sean MacBride
- Secretary General
- sectarian warfare
- Sectarianism
- Secular one-state
- secular Zionism
- secularism
- security
- Security Council
- Security Council veto
- Security Councull veto
- Selection Process
- self-determination
- Self-reflections
- semantics
- Sepp Blatter
- Serena Williams
- Settlement Outposts
- Settlements
- SHEEL-SHOCKED
- Shimon Peres
- Shinzo Abe
- Shireen Issawi
- Shlomo Sand
- Shooting the Messenger
- Silicon Valley
- Sisi
- Smearing BDS
- social welfare
- South Africa
- South African apartheid
- Special Rapporteur
- Special Rapporteur on Palestine
- Special Relationship
- Special Relationship (Israel)
- Special Relationship (Saudi Arabia)
- Special Relationships
- Species Idenity
- species survival
- Spirituality
- state building
- state system
- state-centric versus earth-centric
- State-centric world
- Stefan Andersson
- Stephen Rappp
- Stephen Zunes
- Steven Salaita
- substantive democracy
- superdelegates
- suppression
- Surveillance
- sustainability
- sustainable peace
- Swedish initiative
- Swedish recognition pledge
- Sykes-Picot
- Sykes-Picot Agreement
- Syria
- Syrian ceasefire
- Syrian Dilemma
- Syrian war crimes
- Tahrir Square
- Ted Cruz
- Temple Mount and Western Wall
- tennis
- TEPCO
- Terrorism
- terrorism
- terrorist
- The Economist
- The Orwellian State
- Third Parties
- Thomas Jefferson
- Three Pillars of American foreign policy
- Timothy Snyder
- Tom Friedman
- torture
- traitor
- Transformational Horizons
- treason
- tribalism
- Trumism
- Trump
- Trump Era
- Trump Foreign Policy
- Trump Presidency
- Trump's demonic worldview
- Trump's geopolitics
- Trump's Inaugural Address
- Trump's worldview
- Trumpism
- Trumpt
- Tsutomu Yamaguchi
- Tunisia
- Turkey
- Turkey
- Turkey-Yemen
- Turkish domestic politics
- Turkish Elections
- Turkish foreign policy
- Turkish leadership
- Turkish November elections
- Twitter tweets
- two-state consensus
- Two-State Solution
- Two-State-Solution
- Two-states
- U.S. Congress
- U.S. Constitution
- U.S. Constitutionalism
- U.S. Foreign Policy
- U.S. Global State
- U.S. Government role
- U.S. State Department
- U.S./Israel Alliance
- UAE
- Ukraine
- UN
- UN 'shame list'
- UN Balance Sheet
- UN Charter
- UN Commission of Inquiry
- UN funding
- UN Human Rights Council
- UN Reform
- UN Secretary General
- UN Security Council
- UN Security Council Veto
- UN veto
- UN Watch
- Uncategorized
- Uncertainty
- underground homes
- UNESCO
- United Nations
- United States
- United States
- United States alliance
- United States Congress
- United States foreign policy
- United States response
- Uniting for Peace Resolution
- Unity Government
- universal jurisdiction
- University of Illinois
- UNSC 2334
- US 'Special Relationships'
- US Congress
- US interference
- US-Israel Special Relationship
- utopianism
- Vanunu
- Versailles Peace Treaty
- Veto Power
- Victors' Justice
- Victory Caucus
- Victory Scenario
- Vietnam
- Vietnam and Palestine
- Vietnam Lessons
- Vietnam War
- Virginia Tilley
- Vision of Prague
- Voluntary Agreement
- Wahabbism
- Wahabism
- Wall Street
- war crimes
- war journalism
- war making
- War on Terror
- war prevention
- Warsaw Ghetto
- Warsaw Zoo
- Wesphalian Model
- West
- West Point
- Westphalia
- Westphalian Representation
- William Schabas
- wisdom
- Women's March
- WOMP
- Woodrow Wilson
- world citizen
- world government
- World Government Research Network
- world order
- World Order Models Project
- World Parliament
- World Politics
- World War I
- World War I diplomacy
- worldview
- Xi Jinping
- Yeats
- Yemen
- Yemen Intervention
- Yenkapi Rally
- Zbigniew Brzezinski
- Zionism
- Zombie Solution
- zoo animals
Education
Newspapers
Advertisements
Goldstone’s Folly: Disappointing and Perverse
4 NovThis post is a slightly revised version of an online article published yesterday by Al jazeera English.
*************************************************************************************************************************************
Surely, the New York Times would not dare turn down a piece from the new Richard Goldstone who had already recast himself as the self-appointed guardian of Israel’s world reputation even as he had earlier been anointed as the distinguished jurist who admirably put aside his ethnic identity and personal affiliations when it came to carrying out his professional work as a specialist in international criminal law or in carrying out high profile investigative and factfinding missions in the international arena. Goldstone was even seemingly willing to confront the Zionist furies of Israel when criticized by one of their own adherents in chairing the UN panel appointed to consider allegations of Israeli war crimes during the Gaza War of 2008-09 .
A few months ago Goldstone took the unseemly step of unilaterally retracting a central conclusion of the ‘Goldstone Report’ during those attacks on Gaza. The former judge wrote, then in a column in the Washington Post, that the Goldstone Report would have been different if he had known then what he came to know now, an arrogant assertion considering that he was but one of four panel members designated by the UN Human Rights Council, and considering that the other three publicly reaffirmed their confidence in the original conclusion as presented in the report written and released months earlier. What should have been discrediting of this earlier Goldstone effort to restore his tarnished Zionist credentials was this failure to consult with other members of the team before rushing into print with his seemingly opportunistic change of heart. It is also of interest that he chooses to exhibit this new role on the pages of the newspapers of record in the United States, and reportedly escalated the tone and substance of his retraction after the Times rejected the original version of the piece supposedly because it was too bland. To get into print with this wobbly change of position, Goldstone went to these extraordinary lengths.
Now on the eve of the third session of the Russell Tribunal on Palestine scheduled to be held in Cape Town between November 5-7 Goldstone has again come to the defense of Israel in a highly partisan manner that abandons any pretense of judicious respect for either the legal duties of those with power or the legal rights of those in vulnerable circumstances. Recourse to a quality tribunal of the people, in this instance constituted by and participated in by those with the highest moral authority and specialized knowledge, is a constructive and serious response to the failure of governments and international institutions to declare and implement international criminal law over the course of many years, and the unavailability of either the International Court of Justice or the International Criminal Court. Persons of good will should welcome these laudable efforts by the Russell NGO as overdue rather angrily dismiss them as Goldstone does because of their supposed interference with non-existent and long futile negotiations between the parties. Those who will sit as jurors to assess these charges of apartheid against Israel are world class moral authority figures whose response to the apartheid charge will be assisted by the testimony of experts on the conflict and by jurists of global stature. It should embarrass Goldstone to write derisively of such iconic South African personalities as Archbishop Emeritus Desmond Tutu and Ronnie Kasrils or internationally renowned figures such as the morally driven novelist Alice Walker, Nobel Peace Prize winner Mairead Maguire, former member of the U.S. Congress Cynthia McKinney, the 93 year old Holocaust survivor and French ambassador, Stephane Hessel, as well as several other person of high repute.
A further imprimatur of respectability is given to the Russell Tribunal by the participation in the event of Goldstone’s once close colleague, John Dugard, who is internationally regarded as South Africa’s most trusted voice whenever legal comparisons are made between apartheid as practiced in South Africa and alleged in Palestine. Professor Dugard will play a leading role in the Russell proceedings by offering expert testimony in support of the legal argument for charging Israel with the crime of apartheid. Professor Dugard, a widely esteemed international lawyer and global public figure, who was scrupulous in his efforts to report truthfully on the situation of occupied Palestine while acting for seven years as Special Rapporteur for the UN Human Rights Council, which led him already in that role, despite his cautious legal temperament, to allege the apartheid character of the occupation in his formal reports submitted to the United Nations several years ago.
Goldstone condemns the venture before it begins without acknowledging the participation of these distinguished participants, scorning this inquiry into the injustice and criminality of Israeli discriminatory practices associated with its prolonged occupation of Palestine by contending that it is intended as an “assault” on Israel with the “aim to isolate, demonize and delegitimize” the country. In the most aggressive prosecutorial style, Goldstone demonizes these unnamed Russell jurors as biased individuals who hold “harsh views of Israel.” The new Goldstone adopts the standard Israel practice of denigrating the auspices and by condemning any critical voices, however qualified and honest they may be, without bothering to take a serious look at the plausibility of the apartheid allegations. The fact that those familiar with the Israeli policies are sharp critics does not invalidate their observations but raises substantive challenges that can only be met by producing convincing countervailing evidence. Unbalanced realities can only be accurately portrayed by a one-sided assessment if truthfulness is to be the guide to decide whether bias is present or not. If the message contains unpleasant news then it deserves respect precisely because delivered by a trustworthy messenger. It should be reflected upon with respect rather than summarily dismissed because this particular messenger has the credibility associated with an impeccable professional reputation, and strengthened in the context of the Russell Tribunal by a wealth of prior experience that predisposed and prepared her or him to compose a message with a particular slant.
The central Goldstone contention is that to charge Israel with the crime of apartheid is a form of “slander” that in his words is not only “false and malicious” but also “precludes, rather than promotes, peace and harmony.”
Of course, it is necessary to await the deliberations of the Russell Tribunal to determine whether allegations of apartheid are irresponsible accusations by hostile critics or are grounded, as I believe, in the reality of a systematic legal regime of discriminatory separation of privileged Israelis, especially several hundred thousand unlawful settlers, from rightless and often dispossessed Palestinians, who are indigenous to the land so long occupied by Israel. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court treats apartheid as one among several types of crime against humanity, and associates its commission with systematic and severe discrimination.
Although the crime derives its name from the South African experience that ended in 1994 it has now been generalized to refer to any condition that imposes an oppressive regime based on group identity and designed to benefit a dominating collectivity that coercively through its control of the legal system abuses a subjugated collectivity. It is true that ‘race’ is the basis for drawing the dividing line between the two collectivities, but the legal definition of race has been expanded to make it clear beyond reasonable doubt that the practice of apartheid can be properly associated with any form of group antagonism that is translated into a legal regime incorporating inequality as its core feature. This includes regimes that base their human classification of belonging to a group by reference to national and ethnic identity as is the case with regard to Israelis and Palestinians. The government of Israel has itself drawn attention to this ethno/religious divide by demanding that its Palestinian minority and the Palestinian Authority formally accept its character as ‘a Jewish state.’
The overwhelming evidence of systematic discrimination is impossible to overlook in any objective description of the Israel’s current occupation of the West Bank, and to a lesser degree, East Jerusalem. The pattern of establishing settlements for Israelis throughout the West Bank not only violates the prohibition in international humanitarian law against transferring members of the occupying population to an occupied territory. It also creates the operational rationalization by Israel for the establishment of a legal regime of separation and subjugation. From this settlement phenomenon follows an Israeli community protected by Israeli security forces, provided at great expense with a network of settler only roads, enjoying Israeli constitutional protection, and given direct unregulated access to Israel. What also follows is a Palestinian community subject to often abusive military administration without the protection of effective rights, living with great daily difficulty due to many burdensome restrictions on mobility, and subject to an array of humiliating and dangerous conditions that include frequent Israeli use of arbitrary and excessive force, house demolitions, nighttime arrests and detentions that subjects Palestinians as a whole to a lifetime ordeal of acute human insecurity. The contrast of these two sets of conditions, translated into operative legal regimes, for two peoples living side by side makes the allegations of apartheid seem persuasive, and if a slander is present then it attributed to those who like Goldstone seek to defame and discredit the Russell Tribunal’s heroic attempt to challenge the scandal of silence that has allowed Israel to perpetrate injustice without accountability.
Goldstone’s preemptive strike against the Russell Tribunal is hard to take seriously. It is formulated in such a way as to mislead and confuse a generally uninformed public. For instance, he devotes much space in the column to paint a generally rosy (and false) picture of recent conditions of life experienced by the Palestinian minority in Israel without even taking note of their historic experience of expulsion, the nakba. He dramatically understates the deplorable status of Palestinian Israelis who live as a discriminated minority despite enjoying some of the prerogatives of Israeli citizenship. Goldstone’s main diversionary contention is that apartheid cannot be credibly alleged in such a constitutional setting where Palestinian are currently accorded citizenship rights, and he never dares to raise the question of what it means to ask Palestinian Muslims and Christians to pledge allegiance to ‘a Jewish state,’ by its nature as a fracturing of community based on racially based inequality. Few would argue that this pattern of unacceptable inequality adds up to an apartheid structure within Israel, and the Russell allegation does not so argue, and is likely to forego making the apartheid charge associated with the events surrounding the founding of Israel in the late 1940s because from an international law perspective they took place before apartheid was criminalized in the mid-1970s.
The Tribunal is focusing its attention on the situation existing in the West Bank that has been occupied since 1967. John Dugard has issued a statement to clear the air, indicating that his testimony will be devoted exclusively to the existence of conditions of apartheid obtaining in the occupied territories, which reflects his special competence. [See Statement of John Dugard, “Apartheid and the Occupation of Palestine,” Aljazeera, 4 Nov. 2011; ] That Dugard had to issue such a statement is a kind of backhanded tribute to the success of the Goldstone hasbara effort to divert and distort. For Goldstone to refute the apartheid contention by turning to the present situation within Israel itself, while at the same time virtually ignoring the allegation principally concerned with the occupation is a stunning display of bad faith. He knows better. Goldstone avoids any reference to the Israeli mass expulsion of Palestinians from their land in 1948 and the subsequent destruction of hundreds of Palestinian villages when he attempts to refute the apartheid allegation, which would likely be viewed as legally dubious because of its retroactivity.
With shameless abandon Goldstone relies in his diatribe on another debater’s trick by insisting that apartheid is a narrowly circumscribed racial crime of the exact sort that existed in South Africa is certainly disingenuous. Goldstone takes scant account of the explicit legal intent, as embodied in the authoritative Rome Statute and in the International Convention on the Crime of Apartheid, to understand race in a much broader sense that applies to the Israeli/Palestine interaction if its systematic and legally encoded discriminatory character can be convincingly established as I believe is the case.
The sad saga of Richard Goldstone’s descent from pinnacles of respect and trust to this shabby role as legal gladiator recklessly jousting on behalf of Israel is as unbecoming as it is unpersuasive. It is undoubtedly a process more personal and complex than caving in to Zionist pressures, which were even nastier and more overt than usual, as well as being clearly defamatory, but what exactly has led to his radical shift in position remains a mystery. As yet there is neither an autobiographical account nor a convincing third party interpretation. Goldstone himself has been silent on this score, seeming to want us to believe that he is now as much a man of the law as ever, but only persisting in his impartial and lifelong attempt to allow the chips to fall where they may. Given his polemical manipulation of the facts and arguments makes us doubt any such self-serving explanation based on the alleged continuities of professionalism. It is my judgment that enough is now known to acknowledge Goldstone’s justifiable fall from grace, and for his own sake it is unfortunate that Goldstone did not choose a silent retreat from the fray rather than to reinvent himself as a prominent Israeli apologist.
Palestinian suffering and denial of legal rights is sufficiently grounded in reality that the defection of such an influential witness amounts to a further assault not only on Palestinian wellbeing but also on the wider struggle to achieve justice, peace, and security for both peoples. Contrary to Goldstone protestations about the Russell Tribunal striking a blow against hopes for resolving the conflict, it is the Goldstones of this world that are producing the smokescreens behind which the very possibility of a two-state solution has been deliberately destroyed by Israel’s tactics of delay while accelerating its policies of expansion and encroachment.
In the end if there is ever to emerge a just and sustainable peace it will be thanks to many forms of Palestinian resistance and a related campaign of global solidarity of which the Russell Tribunal promises to make a notable contribution. We should all remember that it is hard to render the truth until we render the truth however ugly it may turn out to be!
Tags: Israel, John Dugard, Nobel Peace Prize, Palestine, Richard Goldstone, Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Russell Tribunal, United Nations