Archive | UN veto RSS feed for this section
Richard Falk
Richard Falk is an international law and international relations scholar who taught at Princeton University for forty years. Since 2002 he has lived in Santa Barbara, California, and taught at the local campus of the University of California in Global and International Studies and since 2005 chaired the Board of the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation. He initiated this blog partly in celebration of his 80th birthday.
Archives
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
Tags
AKP
anti-Semitism
apartheid
Balfour Declaration
Barack Obama
BDS
Climate change
Cold War
Democracy
diplomacy
Donald Trump
Egypt
Erdogan
European Union
Gaza
Gaza Strip
geopolitics
George W. Bush
Gilad Shalit
Hamas
Hilary Clinton
Hiroshima
Holocaust
Hosni Mubarak
Human rights
International Court of Justice
International Criminal Court
international law
Iran
Iraq
Iraq War
ISIS
Israel
Israel-Palestine
Israel/Palestine
Japan
Jerusalem
Libya
Middle East
militarism
NATO
Netanyahu
New York Times
Nobel Peace Prize
Nuclear disarmament
nuclear weapons
Obama
Palestine
Palestinian people
Palestinian prisoners in Israel
Palestinian territories
peace process
Recep Tayyip Erdoğan
revolution
Richard Falk
Russia
Saudi Arabia
Snowden
Soviet Union
Syria
Tel Aviv
Terrorism
Trump
Turkey
UN
United Nations
United Nations Security Council
United States
Vietnam
Vietnam War
war crimes
Washington
West Bank
World War II
Zionism
Recent Posts
Categories
- 'Abnormal' Japan
- 'Fortress World'
- 'Normal' Japan
- 'Operation Protective Edge'
- 'Peace Process'
- 'Voluntary' International Law
- (un)civility
- 13 Demands
- 1915 Genocide
- 1948 War of Independence
- 1967 War
- 9/11 Attacks
- A Quiet Heart
- A remebrance
- Abbas
- Abdullah Gul
- Abraham Center for Middle East Peace
- academic freedom
- acadmic freedom
- accountability
- Adala Urgent Appeal
- Administrative Detention
- Africa
- aggression
- Ahed Tamimi
- Ahmet Davutoğlu
- AKP
- Al Aqsa Mosque
- al-Shayat Airfield
- Alfred Nobel
- Algeria
- Ali Mazrui
- alliance
- Altamont Speedway Concert
- Alternative Facts
- America
- America as republic
- American elections
- American Embassy Seuzure
- American foreign policy
- American presidential campaign
- American presidential election
- American racism
- American Sniper
- AMEXIT
- Amos Oz
- and Opponents
- Anit-BDS Summit
- anit-Semitism
- Anti-colonialism
- anti-Semitism
- anti-Semitism
- Anti-Zionism UN Resolution
- Antonina Zabinski
- apartheid
- Apartheid Convention
- Apology
- Aquino
- Arab Spring
- Armenia
- Armenian community
- Armenian Genocide
- arms control
- arms sales
- Article 9
- aspirational democracy
- asymmetric warfare
- Ataturk
- atomic attacks
- atomic bomb
- Audre Lorde
- Auschwitz
- authoritarianism
- autocracy
- Ayatollah Khomeini
- Ayelet Shaked
- Azopt
- Balfour Declaration
- Ban KI-moon
- BAN Treaty
- Barack Obama
- Bashar el-Assad
- Basher al Assad
- BBC
- BDS
- BDS Campaign
- BDS-Bashing
- Belgium
- Ben Ali Saleh
- Benjiman Netanyahu
- Bernie Sanders
- Berrigan Brothers
- Bibi Netanyahu
- Bill Clinton
- Bill Cosby
- Binali Yildirim
- binary thinking
- Biopolitical Moment
- blog boundaries
- blog civility
- blog comments
- Blog ethics
- Bob Kerrie
- book burning
- BREXIT
- British Mandate
- Brzezinski
- Bush family
- Caeser Group
- Cambodia
- campaign fundraising
- capital punishment
- Capitalism
- Carl Schmitt
- Caterpillar
- Catholicism
- ceasefire
- Chaim Weizman
- charismatic resilience
- Charles Blow
- Charlie Hebdo
- Charlottesville
- Chas Freeman
- Chemical Weapons
- Cherif Chouachi
- Chernobyl
- child prisoners
- China
- CHP
- Christmas
- Christopher Kennedy
- citizen pilgrim
- citizenship
- City of
- citzenship
- civil disobedience
- civil society
- Civil Society Discourse
- civil society tribunals
- civility
- Claudia Rankine
- Clean Break
- Climate Change
- climate denial
- climate justice
- Clinton
- Clinton Defeat
- Clinton's belligerence
- Cold War
- collective punishment
- collective security
- Collective Self-Defense
- Colombia Peace Process
- Colonial Legacies
- colonialism
- Comment Guidelines
- Commentary
- Complexity
- Conservative Republicans
- Constitutional issues
- consumerism
- contextual and configurative analysis
- Copenhagen failure
- Corporate responsibility
- cosmic consciousness
- cosmopolitanism
- Council of Foreign Relations
- counter-terrorism
- Counterinsurgency Tactics
- counterinsurgency warfare
- Counterinsurgency Wars
- Counterrevolution
- counterterrorism
- Coup aftermath
- Coup attempt
- Cour failure
- Craig Hicks
- crime of apartheid
- crime or war
- Crimea
- Crimes against Humanity
- Crimes of State
- Criminal Accountability
- Criminal Law
- Criminality
- Cruz
- Cuban Revolution
- cultural imagination
- cultural war of aggression
- culture of violence
- cyber attacks
- Dan Ellsberg
- Daniel Berrigan
- Daniel Ellsberg
- Daniel Pipes
- Dany Danon
- Dautoglu
- David Krieger
- Davutoglu
- Dayan Jayatilleka
- debate
- decline of democracy
- Defamation
- Defamatory Comments
- demagogue
- demilitarization
- democracy
- democratic elections
- Democratic Paarty
- Democratic Party
- Democratic Party foreign policy
- Demographic Bomb
- denuclearization
- Depolarization
- Derrida
- deterrence
- dialogic humility
- dialogue
- Dieudonne
- digital age
- Digital Etiquette
- Digital Home
- Digital India
- Diploamacy
- diplomacy
- diplomatic initiative
- Diplomatic Protocol
- dipomacy
- disarmament
- discourse
- dispossession
- Donald Trump
- double standards
- Douma CW attack
- drone warfare
- drones
- drug prices
- dystopia
- early Christianity
- Ebrahim Yazdi
- eco-humanism
- eco-insurgency
- eco-politics
- ecological alienation
- Ecological Civilization
- ecological collapse
- Ecological Ethos
- ecological jurisprudence
- ecology
- Economic embargo
- education
- educational reform
- Edward Said
- Edward Snowden
- Effective Control
- Egypt
- Egypt (2011) (2013)
- Electoral College
- electoral politics
- Elizabeth McAlister
- ending apartheid
- ending occupation
- Enlightenment
- environmment
- Eqbal Ahmed
- Erdogan
- ESCWA
- ESCWA Report
- espionage
- Ethics of Apology
- Ethno-nationalist Moment
- ethnocracy
- ethnographhic moment
- Euromed
- Europe
- European statecraft
- European Union
- European Unity
- failed coup
- False Certainty
- False Consciousness
- fanaticism
- fascism
- Father Miguel D'Escoto
- Fethullah Gulen
- FETO
- Fetullah extradition
- Fetullah Gulen
- Fidel
- Fidel Castro
- FIFA
- FIFA and Palestinian Football
- Force-feedomg
- foreign military bases
- forgiveness
- Fouad Ajami
- France and the United States
- Francis Fukuyama
- Fred Skolnik
- Fredrik Heffermehl
- freedom of expression
- Fukashima Daiichi
- Fukushima
- Fulbright Vietnam University
- funding terrrorism
- future generations
- Gandhi
- Gaza
- Gaza
- Gaza occupation
- Gaza oppressi
- General Yair Golan
- genocide
- Genocide Controversy
- Genocide Convention
- Genocide-duty to prevent
- Geoffrey Darnton
- Geopolitic bersus International Law
- geopolitical laws
- Geopolitical Militarism
- geopolitics
- George H.W. Bush
- George McGovern
- George W. Bush
- Germany
- Gerry Spence
- Gideon Levy
- glaucoma
- Global autocracy
- Global Battlefield
- Global Capital
- global citizen
- global domination project
- Global Governance
- Global Imperial State
- global interest
- global justice
- global leadership
- Global presidency
- global risks
- global security
- Global State
- global warming
- Grand Inquisitor
- Grand Strategy
- Guantanamo
- Gujurat
- Gulf Cooperation Council
- Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)
- Gulf Crisis
- Gulf Crisis of 2014
- Gulf Monarchies
- gun culture
- hacking
- Haider Eid
- Haim Saban
- Hamas
- Hamas Charter
- Hanan Ashrawi
- harmony with nature
- Harrisburg 7
- hasbara
- hate speech
- HDP
- Health
- Heffermehl
- Henry Kissinger
- Henry L. Stimson
- Henry Paulson
- Hersch Lauterpacht
- Hewlett Packard
- hibakusha
- Hilary Clinton
- Hilary Clinton's foreign policy
- Hillary Clinton
- Hiroshima
- Hirosshima
- History
- Hizmet
- Hizmet movement
- Ho Chi Minh
- Holocaust
- House of Commons vote
- Houthis
- human interest
- human interests
- Human Rights
- Human Rights
- Human Rights Council
- Human Rights Watch
- human security
- humanism
- Hunger Strike
- identity
- imagination
- Imelda Marcos
- Implementation
- impunity
- Incitement to Genocide
- inclusiveness
- indefinite detention
- India
- Indian Wells Tennis Tournament
- Insiders v. Outsiders
- internal displacement
- Internation Law
- International & Global Law
- International Chaos
- International Court of Justice
- International Court of Justice (ICJ)
- International Crimes
- International Criminal Court
- International criminal law
- International Day of Solidarity with Palestinian People
- international humanitarian law
- international law
- international law
- international lawyers
- International Liberal Order
- International reputation
- intervention
- interview
- Iran
- Iran (1979)
- Iran diplomacy
- Iran Nuclear Agreement
- Iran nuclear diplomacy
- Iran Nuclear Program
- Iran's nuclear program
- Iranian democracy
- Iraq occupation
- Iraq War
- Ireland
- ISIS
- Islamophobia
- Israel
- Israel elections
- Israel Palestine
- Israel prisons
- Israel's Arms Industry
- Israel's Obligations under IHL
- Israel-Palestine
- Israel/Palestine
- Israel/Palestine
- Israeli 'Democracy'
- Israeli apartheid
- Israeli assassinations
- Israeli Entitlements
- Israeli impunity
- Israeli jurisprudence
- Israeli Law
- Israeli Lobby
- Israeli one-state
- Israeli One-State Solution
- Israeli one-state unilateralism
- Israeli Prisons
- Israeli Security Establishment
- Israeli soul searching
- Israeli war crimes
- Istanbul
- Italy
- Jacob Mchangama
- Jacques Derrida
- James Douglass
- James Zogby
- Japan
- JCPOA
- Jean Bricmont
- Jeff Halper
- Jeremy Hammond
- Jerusalem
- Jerusalem Resolution
- Jerusalem UN Resolution
- Jewish exceptionalism
- Jewish identity
- Jewish Voices for Peace
- jihadism
- Jill Stein
- John Bolton
- John Ikenberry
- John Kasich
- John Kerry
- John Pilger
- Joint Declaration on International Law
- Joint Statement of Opposition
- Jonathan Pollard
- Joseph Nye
- journalistic ethics
- Juan Manuel Santos
- July 15th
- July 15th Coup Attempt
- justice
- Kader Asmal
- Kellyanne Conway
- Kerry Diplomacy
- Khan Sheikhoun
- Kim Jung-un
- Kissinger
- knowledge
- Kosovo
- Kurdish conflict
- Kurdish Issues
- Kurdish movement
- Kurdish struggle
- Kurdish victory
- Kurds
- Kyoto
- Laos
- Law Enforcement
- Lawfare
- Lawfare Project
- leadership
- leadership crisis
- League of Nations
- Legitimacy
- Legitimacy War
- Legitimacy War
- Legitimacy Wars
- liberal
- Liberal Democrats
- Liberal Zionism
- liberalism
- Libya
- Lidia Yuknavitch
- logic of reciprocity
- lost causes
- luxury
- Macron
- Madrid train bombings
- Mahmoud Abbas
- Makarim Wibisono
- Marco Rubio
- Marcos
- Mario Savio
- Marjorie Cohn
- Marsahll Islands nuclear zero litigation
- Martin Niemoller
- Marwan Barghouti
- Max Blumenthal
- Mazin Qumsiyeh
- media
- meditative intelligence
- Mega-Terorism
- megaterrorism
- memoir
- Memories
- Mendlovitz
- Mental Health
- Mexico
- Michael Moore
- Michael Oren
- Michael Walzer
- Middle East
- Middle East Forum
- Middle East geopolitics
- Middle Easy
- Miguel d'Escoto
- Mika Brzezinski
- Mikhail Gorbachev
- militarism
- military intervention
- military technology
- Mira Regev
- Mission for Growth
- Modernity
- Mohammed Omer
- Money
- Moral Revolution
- Morning 'Joe'
- Motorola Solutioons
- Muslim Brotherhood
- Nagasaki
- Nakba
- Nakba as Process
- Naomi Klein
- NAPF
- Narendra Modi
- national interest
- national liberation
- National Review
- National Security
- national security legislation
- nationalism
- NATO
- Nazi period
- Nebraska
- needs based development
- Neoliberal Capitalism
- neoliberalism
- Netanyahu
- netizenship
- New Anti-Semitism
- New Cold War
- new geopolitics
- New Wars
- new world order
- New York Times
- NGOs
- Nicaragua
- Nikki Haley
- no first use
- No Fly Zone (NFZ)
- Nobel Peace Forum
- Nobel Peace Prize
- Nobel Prize
- Non-intervention
- Non-violent Struggle
- nonproliferation
- nonproliferation
- nonproliferation treaty
- Nonviolence
- Nonviolent Resistance
- normative democracy
- North Carolina murders
- North Korea
- north/south divide
- NPT
- NPT Article IV
- nuclear age
- Nuclear Age Peace Foundation
- Nuclear Ban Treaty
- nuclear civil disobeidence
- Nuclear Disarmament
- Nuclear disarmament
- nuclear education
- Nuclear Famine
- nuclear power
- nuclear securitization
- nuclear war
- Nuclear Weapons
- Nuclear Weapons Policy
- nuclearism
- Nuremberg Human Rights Award 2017
- Nuremberg Judegment
- Nuremberg Judgment
- Nuremberg Laws
- Nuremberg Obligation
- Nuremberg Principles
- Nuremburg
- NY Times
- Obama
- Obama on nuclear policy
- Obama's foreign policy
- Obama's Irvine Commencement Address
- Obstacle to Peace
- occupation
- Occupied Palestine
- oil
- Okinawa
- Old City of Jerusalem
- old geopolitics
- Omar Barghouti
- One-Israel-State-Solution
- One-state
- one-state solution
- Open Letter to Trump
- oppression
- Oppressive Occupation
- Oren Ben-Dor
- Orientalism
- Oslo Approach
- Oslo diplomacy
- Oslo Peace Process
- Oslo Process
- Outlaw State
- P-5
- P5
- P5 +1 Agreement
- Pacification
- Palestine
- Palestine
- Palestine Authority
- Palestine Prisoners
- Palestine statehood
- Palestine/Israel
- Palestinian Authority
- Palestinian children prisoners
- Palestinian people
- Palestinian Self-determination
- Palestinian solidarity
- Palestinian statehood
- Palestinians
- Paris 2015
- Paris Agreement
- Paris Attacks
- Paris Climate Change Agreement
- Paris Preamble
- Partition Resolution
- Partition War
- Patriotism
- Paul Raskin
- peace
- Peace and Justice
- peace journalism
- Peace process
- Peace Talks
- Peace Through Diplomacy
- Pearl Harbor
- Pentagon
- Peres Funeral
- Personal Background
- petropolitics
- Philip Berrigan
- Philippines
- Phyllis Bennis
- Pivot away from Middle East
- Pivot to Asia
- PKK
- Plan B: Colonial Retreat
- Plan C: A Just Peace
- Planetary Realism
- PLO
- Plowshares 8
- Poems
- Poetic Wisdom
- Poetry
- poetry & war
- polarization
- Police Brutality
- Police State
- political community
- Political Community?
- Political correctness
- political extremism
- political fundraising
- political leadership
- political style
- political violence
- Politics of Apology
- Politics of Language
- Pope Francis
- Popular Mobilization
- Popular Vote
- populism
- Populist Representation
- Port Huron Statement
- post-colonial colonialism
- Power as Crime
- Pre-Fascism
- Presbyterian Divestment
- President Erdogan
- Presidential Campaign
- Presidential System
- Primary Campaign
- Princeton University
- procedural democracy
- progressive
- Progressive Populism
- Protection of Holy Sites
- Protective Edge
- public intellectual
- Punitive Peace
- Qaddafi
- Qatar
- QGOs
- R2P Diplomacy
- racialized language
- racism
- Radical Humanism
- Rafael Lemkin
- Ralph Nader
- ran
- Recep Tayyip Erdogan
- reconciliation
- Reflections
- Reform
- refugee law
- regime change
- regional conflict
- Regional Disengagement
- Religion
- religious counterrevolution
- representation
- republican democracy
- Republican Party
- republicanism
- Responsibility to Protect (R2P)
- Reuven Rivlin
- Revolution
- Richard Falk
- Richard Goldstone
- Richard Haass
- Richard Kemp
- Rima Khalaf
- risk management
- Risky Business
- Robert Faurisson
- Robert Kaplan
- Robert O Paxton
- Robin Nisblett
- Roger Cohen
- Rome
- Ronald Reagan
- Rouhani
- rules of the game
- Russell Tribunal
- Russia
- Russian hacking
- Ryōkan
- Sakamoto
- Salmon Rushdie
- Samer Issawi
- Samuel Huntington
- Sanctions
- Sanders' Revolution
- Santa Barbara Fires
- Sarin Gas
- Saudi Arabia
- Saudi Royal Family
- SC Res. 242
- Scientific Consensus
- Sean MacBride
- Secretary General
- sectarian warfare
- Sectarianism
- Secular one-state
- secular Zionism
- secularism
- security
- Security Council
- Security Council veto
- Security Councull veto
- Selection Process
- self-determination
- Self-reflections
- semantics
- Sepp Blatter
- Serena Williams
- Settlement Outposts
- Settlements
- SHEEL-SHOCKED
- Shimon Peres
- Shinzo Abe
- Shireen Issawi
- Shlomo Sand
- Shooting the Messenger
- Silicon Valley
- Sisi
- Smearing BDS
- social welfare
- South Africa
- South African apartheid
- Special Rapporteur
- Special Rapporteur on Palestine
- Special Relationship
- Special Relationship (Israel)
- Special Relationship (Saudi Arabia)
- Special Relationships
- Species Idenity
- species survival
- Spirituality
- state building
- state system
- state-centric versus earth-centric
- State-centric world
- Stefan Andersson
- Stephen Rappp
- Stephen Zunes
- Steven Salaita
- substantive democracy
- superdelegates
- suppression
- Surveillance
- sustainability
- sustainable peace
- Swedish initiative
- Swedish recognition pledge
- Sykes-Picot
- Sykes-Picot Agreement
- Syria
- Syrian ceasefire
- Syrian Dilemma
- Syrian war crimes
- Tahrir Square
- Ted Cruz
- Temple Mount and Western Wall
- tennis
- TEPCO
- Terrorism
- terrorism
- terrorist
- The Economist
- The Orwellian State
- Third Parties
- Thomas Jefferson
- Three Pillars of American foreign policy
- Timothy Snyder
- Tom Friedman
- torture
- traitor
- Transformational Horizons
- treason
- tribalism
- Trumism
- Trump
- Trump Era
- Trump Foreign Policy
- Trump Presidency
- Trump's demonic worldview
- Trump's geopolitics
- Trump's Inaugural Address
- Trump's worldview
- Trumpism
- Trumpt
- Tsutomu Yamaguchi
- Tunisia
- Turkey
- Turkey
- Turkey-Yemen
- Turkish domestic politics
- Turkish Elections
- Turkish foreign policy
- Turkish leadership
- Turkish November elections
- Twitter tweets
- two-state consensus
- Two-State Solution
- Two-State-Solution
- Two-states
- U.S. Congress
- U.S. Constitution
- U.S. Constitutionalism
- U.S. Foreign Policy
- U.S. Global State
- U.S. Government role
- U.S. State Department
- U.S./Israel Alliance
- UAE
- Ukraine
- UN
- UN 'shame list'
- UN Balance Sheet
- UN Charter
- UN Commission of Inquiry
- UN funding
- UN Human Rights Council
- UN Reform
- UN Secretary General
- UN Security Council
- UN Security Council Veto
- UN veto
- UN Watch
- Uncategorized
- Uncertainty
- underground homes
- UNESCO
- United Nations
- United States
- United States
- United States alliance
- United States Congress
- United States foreign policy
- United States response
- Uniting for Peace Resolution
- Unity Government
- universal jurisdiction
- University of Illinois
- UNSC 2334
- US 'Special Relationships'
- US Congress
- US interference
- US-Israel Special Relationship
- utopianism
- Vanunu
- Versailles Peace Treaty
- Veto Power
- Victors' Justice
- Victory Caucus
- Victory Scenario
- Vietnam
- Vietnam and Palestine
- Vietnam Lessons
- Vietnam War
- Virginia Tilley
- Vision of Prague
- Voluntary Agreement
- Wahabbism
- Wahabism
- Wall Street
- war crimes
- war journalism
- war making
- War on Terror
- war prevention
- Warsaw Ghetto
- Warsaw Zoo
- Wesphalian Model
- West
- West Point
- Westphalia
- Westphalian Representation
- William Schabas
- wisdom
- Women's March
- WOMP
- Woodrow Wilson
- world citizen
- world government
- World Government Research Network
- world order
- World Order Models Project
- World Parliament
- World Politics
- World War I
- World War I diplomacy
- worldview
- Xi Jinping
- Yeats
- Yemen
- Yemen Intervention
- Yenkapi Rally
- Zbigniew Brzezinski
- Zionism
- Zombie Solution
- zoo animals
Education
Newspapers
Advertisements
Failing the people of Syria during Seven Years of Devastation and Dispossession
13 NovFailing the people of Syria during Seven Years of Devastation and Dispossession
[Prefatory Note: What follows is a wide-ranging interview in November 2017 that that concentrates on the failure of the UN and the world to rescue the people of Syria by a timely and effective humanitarian intervention. The interview was conducted by a Turkish journalist, Salva Amor, and is to be published in a magazine, Causcasus International. The text of the interview has been slightly modified.]
A missed chance
What turned such an Ideal case for humanitarian intervention into one of the worst humanitarian responses we have seen in recent times?
Answer: I do not recall this reference to Syria as ‘an ideal case,’ but I must have meant it in a hypothetical sense, that is, as if ‘humanitarian intervention’ was ever called for, it was in Syria, especially at the early stages of the conflict. And yet I am inclined to think that regime-changing intervention was at all stages a mission impossible. We should keep in mind that the record of actual successful instances of what is labeled as ‘humanitarian intervention’ has been dismal, and when successful the motivation was not predominantly humanitarian, but rather a confluence of strategic interests of one sort or another with a humanitarian challenge. In Syria the strategic interests were not sufficiently strong to justify the likely costs, especially in the wake of Iraq and Afghanistan.
Sometimes, the intervention is a cover for non-humanitarian goals, as in Afghanistan (2002), Iraq (2003), and Libya (2011) and may be effective in attaining its immediate goals of regime change but is extremely costly from the perspective of humanitarianism if assessed from the perspective of prolonged violence, societal chaos, and human suffering.
And only marginally successful strategically given the resilience of territorial resistance and the pressure for long-term occupation if the original gains of intervention are to be preserved.
At other times, the humanitarian rationale is present, as in Syria, but there is no strategic justification of sufficient weight, and what is done by external actors or the UN is insufficient to control the outcome, and often ends up intensifying the scale of suffering endured by the population. In effect, humanitarian intervention rarely achieves a net benefit from the perspective of the population that is being supposedly rescued. Perhaps, Kosovo (1999) is the best recent case where an alleged humanitarian intervention enjoyed enough strategic value to be effective, and yet seems to have left the Kosovar population better off afterwards, although even Kosovo is not a clear case.
Failures & implications of inaction
Could the surge of refugees fleeing to Europe have been avoided had a more positive and organized humanitarian intervention taken place?
Answer: It is possible that had Syria possessed large oil reserves, the intervention against the Damascus regime would have been robust enough to topple the regime, and create stability before combat conditions prompted massive internal population displacements and gigantic refugee flows, including the European influx. In this sense, Libya with oil, did prompt such an intervention, although it was an easier undertaking, as the Qaddafi regime had much less popular support than did the Assad regime, and was less well equipped militarily and lacked regional allies. In Syria, because of regional and global geopolitical cleavages, the politics of intervention and counter-intervention was far more complicated, and inhibited potential anti-regime interveners from making large commitments. At the early stages of the conflict Turkey and the United States miscalculated the costs and scale of a successful intervention in Syria, supposing that an indirect and low level effort could be effective in achieving regime change, which misunderstood the conditions prevailing in Syria.
The best response
Answer: As my earlier responses hinted, there is no ideal response, and the current world order system is not reliably capable of handling humanitarian intervention in a situation such as existed in Syria. To have any chance of effectiveness would require entrusting the undertaking to one or more powerful states, but even then the situation that would follow, is highly uncertain. In a post-colonial setting, there is bound to be strong nationalist and territorial resistance to outside intervention and occupation, generally producing serious prolonged chaos. If the country is very small and can be overwhelmed (Granada, Panama) without counter-intervention the undertaking will sometimes work. Iraq serves as a clear example of an intervention that did rid the country of a brutal tyrant, but produced internal violence among competing regions, tribes, and generated extreme sectarian strife between Sunnis and Shiites, as well as a series of ethnic, tribal, and regional battles.
In a better governed world, which is far from existing, the UN would have acted robustly and with the support of the regional governments in the Middle East, the geopolitical actors (U.S. and Russia) would have not pursued their strategic agendas, and a politically neutral intervention would have created the conditions for a post-Assad democratic political transition, including imposing accountability for past crimes. Merely mentioning this desirable scenario is enough to reveal its utopian character. Especially in the Middle East, geopolitics of a regional and global scope badly distort all efforts to fashion a humanitarian response to repression and severe violations of human rights. In the background, but not far in the background, is the relevance of oil. The countries that have experienced massive interventions (Iraq, Libya) possessed abundant oil reserves, while those that have little or no oil have either been ignored or endured prolonged bloody conflict, of which Syria is the worst case, having become the scene of competing and offsetting interventions motivated by political and strategic ambitions with only a thin propaganda rationale associated with alleviating a humanitarian crisis, which at best, was a much subordinated goal of the interveners on both sides.
Lessons for Future
4a. How can the world learn from the humanitarian failures and inaction that occurred in Syria for the past 7 years? What opportunities to protect, defend or support the Syrian people have we missed?
Answer: In my view, it is a mistake to speak of ‘inaction’ in the Syrian context. There have been massive interventions of all sorts on both sides of the conflict by a variety of actors, but none decisive enough to end the conflict, and none primarily motivated by humanitarian concerns. Of course, here and there, lives could have been saved, especially if the balance of forces within Syria had been better understood at an early stage of the conflict in the West. What intervention achieved in Syria was largely a matter of magnifying the conflict, and attendant suffering. The conflict itself was surrounded by contradictory propaganda claims making the reality difficult to perceive by the public, and therefore there was political resistance to more explicit and possibly more effective regime changing intervention.
Indifference:
4b. Is there any correlation between the rise of Islamophobia and the world’s inaction towards Syrian people’s suffering? Has the ongoing drumming of hatred towards the Islamic religion created a generation of indifference towards those of them who are suffering? Or is such wide indifference a natural response to such overwhelming humanitarian crisis?
Answer: The indifference in relation to Syria is mainly a matter of public confusion and distrust. Confusion about the nature of the conflict and distrust as to the motives of political actors that have intervened on either side. The spike in Islamophobia is attributable to the interplay of the European refugee crisis and the occurrence of terrorist incidents that are perpetrated by ISIS and its supporters. Of course, the massive refugee flow was prompted by the violence in the Syrian combat zones, which has made Europe most interested in resolving the conflict even if meant allowing a criminal regime to remain in power.
I suppose that the indifference noted in your question is more evident in relation to the plight of the Rohingya people in Myanmar that in response to Syria where, as I have been suggesting, the political context dominates the human suffering, and the Islamic identity of the victimized people is secondary. Also, it is worth recalling the global indifference to genocide in Rwanda (1994) that could have prevented,
or at least minimized, by a timely, and relatively small scale intervention. And on occasion, if the strategic context is supportive, the West will intervene on the Islamic side as in Bosnia and Kosovo in the 1990s, and there in opposition to the Christian side.
Answer: I suppose the basic justification for this behavior is that from the viewpoint of the UN the Damascus regime remains the legitimate government of Syria representing the country at the UN. This is of course a legalistic justification, and evades the real humanitarian crisis as well as the crimes of Assad’s regime. So far, because there is a geopolitical standoff, regionally (Iran v. Saudi Arabia) and globally (Russia v. the U.S. and Turkey), the UN has tried to remain aloof from the ambit of political controversy to the extent possible while doing what it can to alleviate human suffering. I am not knowledgeable about whether the UN aid is reaching the civilian population as claimed. The language of your question suggests that there should be some mechanism for disqualifying a government that commits repeated crimes against its own people from being treated by the UN as a normal member state, but this is not likely to happen anytime soon, and it is tricky as the UN System is built around state-centric ideas of world order.
The right to torture
Answer: I took part recently in a ceremony in Nuremberg Germany that awarded a human rights prize to the photographer, whose identity is kept secret for his safety, responsible for the Caesar Report containing photographic images of Syrian prison torture of some 11,000 prisoners, most of whom are reportedly now dead. There is no question that these images are horrifying, but serious issues have been raised as to the authenticity of this photographic archive. It has been authenticated as genuine by Human Rights Watch, but has also been used by persons closely connected with the U.S. Government to build a case for war crimes prosecutions, particularly against Bashar al Assad. I am not in a position to assess the controversy, yet do not doubt that the Damascus regime has committed many atrocities and are responsible for the great majority of civilian deaths over the course of the last six years in Syria. At the same time the anti-regime forces, which are fragmented, have also committed many war crimes.
These issues of criminal accountability cannot be reliably answered from a distance, or merely on the basis of media reports. What is required is a credible international fact finding commission of inquiry with adequate access to whatever evidence and witnesses remain available.
Answer: The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) UN norm is interpreted and practice is governed by the UN Security Council, and hence is completely subordinated to the manipulations of geopolitics. In this regard, the lesser humanitarian hazard in Libya led to a UN regime-changing mission because the Permanent Members opposed to intervention (China, Russia) were persuaded not to cast their veto for what was being proposed, which was a limited humanitarian mission to protect the then entrapped civilian population of Benghazi. In fact, the NATO undertaking expanded the mission far beyond the Security Council mandate from its inception, angering Russia and China that had abstained out of deference to pleas relating to the humanitarian claims put forward by the NATO members of the Security Council. They later justified their opposition to a more pro-active UN role in Syria by reference to this failure of trust, the unwillingness of the intervening states to respect the limits of the mandate.
What is important to appreciate is that R2P and other UN undertakings must adhere to the constraints of geopolitics. As disturbing as inaction with respect to Syria, is the UN silence with regard to the abuse of the civilian populations of Gaza and Rakhine (Myanmar). It is only when a geopolitical consensus exists, which is quite rare (e.g. failure with respect to Yemen) that it is possible for the UN to play an important humanitarian role in shaping behavior and protecting civilians.
Answer: Part of my response here has already been given in relation to the prior question. I would only add here that the abolition of the veto would be a crucial step, or even an agreement among permanent members of the Security Council to refrain from casting a veto in humanitarian contexts such as Syria. The problem is that the veto powers are extremely unlikely to give up their right of veto, partly because such states do not voluntarily give up power and partly because humanitarian issues are almost always inseparable from diverse and often antagonist geopolitical interests, and therefore the claims are not perceived as humanitarian. This is certainly the case with regard to Syria. The take away conclusion is that the international system as it now functions is rarely motivated by humanitarian considerations when they come into conflict with the strong political preferences and strategic priorities of principal states, and this is true even when the humanitarian crisis is as severe and prolonged as in Syria.
The most constructive response, in view of these realities, is to advocate global reform, but this will not happen without a major mobilization of people throughout the world or as a frantic response to some earth-shaking catastrophe.
Answer: Yes, there was much criticism of Russia for blocking action on Syria, but Russia was acting in accord with the constitutional structure of the UN. The U.S. uses its veto in a comparable way to protect Israel and other allies, and equally irresponsibly, from a moral or humanitarian point of view. It should be remembered that the League of Nations fell apart because major states would not participate, including the United States. The idea of the veto was designed to persuade all major states to participate, with the goal of universality of membership, but at the cost of engendering paralysis and irresponsible obstructions to action whenever veto powers disagree sharply. Your questions raise the crucial issue if this was too high a price to pay for the sake of maintaining universality of participation. One consequence of this tradeoff between geopolitics and effectiveness is to weaken public respect for the UN as an agency for the promotion of justice and decency in global affairs.
As specified in Article 108 of the UN Charter requires the approval of 2/3rds of the entire membership of the UN as well as all five Permanent Members of the Security Council, which means that it will not happen in the foreseeable future in relation to any politically sensitive issue. When World War II ended there was the hope and illusion that countries that cooperated against fascism would continue to cooperate to maintain the peace. As should have been anticipated, it was a forlorn hope.
Answer: Your comment on ISIS is a way of expressing my view that these issues are dominated by geopolitical calculations. ISIS as horrible as it is has not been nearly as responsible for the quality and quantity of suffering inflicted upon the Syrian people by the Damascus regime.
At this point, and given the unavailability of humanitarian intervention, the best Plan B for Syria is to seek a sustainable ceasefire, and this would undoubtedly require making some unpalatable compromises, including the possible retention of Assad as head of state. After all, there are many heads of state with much blood on their hands, and yet their legitimacy as rulers is essentially unchallenged. The way the world is organized makes it unable to impose criminal responsibility on the leaders of sovereign states except in special circumstances of total victory as in World War II, or more recently, in relation to the criminal prosecutions of Saddam Hussein and Milosevic, particular enemies of the West.
Answer: Yes, this is certainly a perceptive observation. When the issue is fairly large scale and internal, and where Muslims are the victims, any effort to intervene is bound to be feeble, at best, which it was in the early stages of 2011-2013 when Turkey and the U.S. cooperated in supporting Friends of Syria, which was mistakenly thought capable of shifting the balance sufficiently in Syria to produce the collapse of the Damascus regime. When that failed, it became obvious that the costs of an effective intervention were viewed in the West as too high and dangerous. Considering the Iranian and Russian alignments with the Syrian government doomed an anti-Damascus intervention.
And as you suggest, the West views ISIS as dangerous enemy, and is prepared to take bigger risks and bear higher costs because Western homeland security is at stake. ISIS is a proclaimed enemy of the West that is perceived as responsible for violent acts, Syria is not, being regarded, at most, as an unattractive regime, partly because in the past, hostile toward Israel. Taking account of these circumstances, the political realist seeks a ceasefire in Syria while going all out to achieve the destruction of ISIS.
Answer: From my earlier responses I am skeptical about what can be done beyond the obvious: give up any hope of securing support for an R2P mandate to protect the Syrian people, and pursue a ceasefire so as to end the suffering. This is not justice, but it may at least spare the Syrian people further trauma and bloodshed.
What the Syrian tragedy and ordeal reveals vividly is the inability of the international community, as now organized, to deal with a humanitarian crisis unless a geopolitical consensus is present in a relatively strong form, regionally and globally. Such a consensus is not even enough if the difficulties of intervention are seen as producing heavy casualties for the intervening side and would impose burdens of a prolonged occupation to achieve post-intervention political order and security.
Europe would benefit at this time from a Syrian ceasefire and the restoration of political normalcy. It would undoubtedly reduce the pressure on European countries created by the Syrian refugee flow, which has given right wing political parties their greatest strength and largest level of popular support since the end of World War II.
Tags: geopolitics, Humanitarian intervention, R2P, regional geopolitics, Syria, UN failure, UN Reform, world order deficiencies