Narrating Turkey at a Time on National Crisis

20 Jul

 

A night before the attempted coup of July 15th, in conversation with an elegant secular business leader and permacologist in the seaside town of Yalikavak I was surprised by the intensity of her negativity toward the government, expressed with beguiling charm. She insisted that Turkey had hit rock bottom, that things in the country could not get worse. I felt speechless to respond to such sentiments that struck me as so out of touch with the reality of Turkey. This woman lives in a beautiful, secluded country house nearby, enjoys an extraordinarily successful career, is associated with a prominent Turkish family, possesses an engaging personality by any measure, and from all appearances lives a harmonious and satisfying modern life of comfort, good works, and human security. And yet she is totally alienated by the Turkish experience of Erdoğan’s prolonged leadership, which she alternatively describes as ‘autocratic’ and ‘Islamic.’ I mention her as the foregrounding of the typical mindset encountered among Turkish secular elites, displaced from their positions of control that lasted until the Kemalist hegemony began to weaken, and an outlook that confines political discussion to enclaves of out of touch likemindedness.

 

When I politely demurred during our dinner, suggesting that while there were justifiable criticisms of the AKP patterns of governance and of Erdoğan’s political style, especially since 2011, Turkey when compared with other countries in the region and its own pre-AKP past, and taking some account of a variety of challenges, still offers the region a positive example of what can be achieved by an energetic and ambitious emerging economy under what had been until recently generally stable political conditions. There are heavy costs of various kinds that should be acknowledged along side this somewhat affirmative picture—human rights have been abridged, üjournalists and academics suppressed who voice strong public criticisms of Erdoğan, and the Turkish state that he leads. There have also been a variety of charges of corruption and contrary well grounded charges of a ‘parallel government’ operating under the secretive authority of the Hizmet movement led by ‘the man in Pennsylvania,’ Fetullah Gülen, a mysterious Muslim cleric who preaches a moderate message. He is alleged to be the mastermind of the subversion of the Turkish state, and is accused by Erdoğan as having orchestrated the failed coup, and on this basis, Turkey has formally demanded his extradition to face criminal prosecution.

 

Arriving in Istanbul in the afternoon of July 15th with the expectation of participating in a conference the next morning held under the auspices of Koç University on the theme “Migration and Securitization of Europe: Views from the Balkan Corridor.” Listed in the program as the keynote speaker I felt quite nervous as to whether my prepared remarks captured the intended spirit of the tevent, but I will never know as an immediate personal impact of the attempted coup was a phone call to our hotel room at 2:00 AM telling us that ‘unfortunately’ it was necessary to cancel the conference. Our newly opened luxury hotel was almost empty, which itself expressed another facet of the reality of Istanbul in the wake of earlier terrorist incidents, most recently, the ghastly attack in late June at the Istanbul Airport. The only other hotel guests were a few families of rich Gulf Arabs with the women heavily veiled in black with only a slit open for their eyes. It was a strange atmosphere. This highly embellished postmodern hotel with its spacious marbled lobbies barely inhabited. I found the unattended electronic monitor at the hotel entrance a useful metaphor for the flawed security consciousness that, despite everything that has happened in the past year, still prevails in Turkey. The beautifully appointed rooms with exceptional views of the Golden Horn, beneath the softly lit graceful buildings that comprise the Topkapi palace, conveyed a different impression of Turkey’s past, present, and possible future than what this new hotel had to offer even in the best of times.

 

 

Before dinner we had walked slowly through our neighborhood of Karakoy, past numerous crowded and vibrant sidewalk cafes where mainly young Turkish men and women were enjoying water pipes, beers, soft drinks. We ended up in a popular nearby Armenian restaurant, admired for the quality of its food. As we entered we were happily surprised to find two close Turkish friends who we had known for the past 20 years, the longtime dean of the Bilgi University School of Law and his lawyer wife. Even though the restaurant was crowded we found a table that allowed our friends to join us. We had an animated conversation that touched lightly on the current political situation in the country and region but without any sense that we were dining amid an imminent internal crisis that would shake the foundations of the Turkish state.

 

In fact, the recent decisions of the government to repair the frayed relations with Russia and Israel were widely welcomed as signs that the Erdoğan leadership might be returning to a more pragmatic foreign policy based on nonintervention, refraining even from pro and con judgments about the political orientation of governments in the inflamed Middle East. This shift was reinforced by indications that efforts were underway to normalize relations with Egypt that had deteriorated badly after the Sisi coup in 2013 against the elected government of Mohammed Morsi, followed by the bloody crackdown of the Muslim Brotherhood leadership and other anti-coup activists. There were even hints by the new prime minister, Binali Yıldırım, that Turkey might be soon softening its insistence that there could be no peace with Syria until Bashar al-Assad gave up his role as leader, and this despite the continued massive genocidal atrocities being carried out the Damascus regime against the Syrian people.

 

Although not articulated in this manner, it certainly seemed that Turkey was moving away from an ideologically driven foreign policy in the Middle East that reflected sectarian biases, and trying to live at peace with all of its neighbors, virtually ‘a second coming’ of ‘Zero problems with neighbors’ as well as the brief flirtation with the unsustainable posture of ‘precious isolation.’

 

As our meal was nearing its end, the manager of the restaurant came to tell our friends, who ate there regularly, that he was hearing startling reports of a coup underway, with the Bosporus bridges closed and occupied by tanks, and Erdoğan’s whereabouts unknown and rumors circulating of his assassination or capture. We were told that people were returning to their homes as soon as possible if they could do so without having to pass over the bridges. We walked calmly in the warm Istanbul night close to the water, heeding the advice to get off the streets.

 

When we got to the room, we tried our best to find out what was happening by listening to TV, trolling through the channels to find some relevant reporting in real time. CNN Turka seemed to be doing the best job, at least until briefly taken over by coup supporters. The news we received at first was that there was sporadic fighting and casualties, and most significantly, that the coup was succeeding in gaining control over key governmental institutions and communications sites. There was an announcement that a state of emergency had been declared by the coup leaders and a curfew imposed. There were pictures on TV of the tanks on the bridges, of explosions in Ankara, gunfire in Istanbul and a report of a helicopter attack on the Parliament, which was meeting in a special session. These announcements were followed by conflicting claims as to who was in control with a dramatic focus on the whereabouts and reaction of Erdoğan.

 

Via CNN Turka Erdoğan was then interviewed by way of an I-Phone feed. He seemed shaken and uncertain, while vowing to take back control of the government, and apprehend those who were seeking its overthrow. It was later learned that the coup planners had changed course at the last minute, aware that the government was onto their scheme, initiating the coup attempt several hours ahead of schedule with the hope of capturing or killing Erdoğan, which seemed to be the key element in their plan. Apparently warned in the nick of time by the head of the Turkish Intelligence Organization (MIT), Hakan Fidan, Erdoğan managed to escape 10-15 minutes before the plotters arrived at the hotel where he was vacationing in Marmaris with 28 soldiers on board two helicopters. After that, according to a Reuters report, Erdoğan made a hazardous journey by plane back to Istanbul, both harassed and protected by F-16 jets aligned on opposite sides, arriving while the airport, including the flight tower, was still apparently under the control of pro-coup forces. The pilot made a dangerous manual landing with minimum lights, and by then the airport was again under the control of government supporters. Erdoğan held a dramatic press conference sitting between large Turkish flags and beneath a huge framed portrait of the founder of the republic, Kemal Ataturk, and speaking confidently that the coup was being defeated, and that forces loyal to the government were generally in control of the country. Erdoğan called on the people to come to the airport, and to the public squares throughout the country, asserting their loyalty to the government and their antipathy to the coup.

 

As night became morning we remained transfixed by the TV reportage of these unfolding events, including how they were being presented to Western audiences by CNN International and BBC. This

kind of passive witnessing contrasted with existential fears produced by F-16 military jets flying continuously over the city at low altitudes, breaking the sound barrier, causing ear-splitting sonic booms that were terrifying and seemed to threaten the onset of major combat. We were strongly reminded of the ordeal faced by the people of Gaza often traumatized by the sound of sonic booms from overflying Israeli jets and Syrians huddled in ruined cities being continuously subject to the terrorizing impact of barrel bombs dropped on the authority of the Syrian government. Unlike the real time abstractions of TV, the ominous activities of these jets, whose purpose we could not then fathom, gave the coup a frighteningly real dimension.

 

Twelve hours after the coup started it was over, and immediately questions were raised, suspicions surfaced, and political analysis reflected the deeply held contradictory views that had preexisted these tumultuous happenings. There were expressions of political unity, a rarity in Turkey, in which all of the leading parties expressed their hostility to the coup and those who undertook such a violent path, signing a declaration to this effect. This could be taken either as a sign of going with the winner in this bitter struggle for power or an indication that the political culture in Turkey had matured to the point where civilianization of political authority had made it unacceptable to mount a military challenge to a democratically elected government of the country under any circumstances. The sea change in Turkish political culture was the conviction across the entire spectrum of polarized politics in the country that change of government must be brought about through the electoral process. In effect, the armed forces no longer were able to claim credibility as the guarantor of the Ataturk principles of republican governance as had been the case in such earlier coups as 1960, 1971 (bloodless coup by threatening memorandum), 1980, and 1997 (a so-called ‘post-modern coup’ that proceeded by way of ultimatum). In retrospect, one of the great achievements of the AKP period of leadership was this assertion of the primacy of the political, as interpreted by elected leaders, and the accompanying marginalization or constitutionalization of the Turkish deep state (composed of military leaders and heads of the intelligence services). As suggested, the opposition leading secular party, CHP, in this coup crisis affirmed civilianization as an integral element of Turkish democracy, but its polarizing opposition to the AKP and Erdoğan withheld any expression of appreciation for this achievement. Many years ago, my dear friend, Erich Rouleau, after serving as ambassador in Ankara for several years and an expert on the politics of the region, expressed the view that the deep state’s veto over the political process was such a formidable obstacle to the establishment of a democratic constitutional order in Turkey that it was unlikely ever to be overcome. Now, of course, the country confronts the opposite problem: an excessive consolidation of power in the office of the presidency with or without the blessing of constitutional reform.

 

With the crisis of the failed coup seemingly effectively resolved, there is emerging what might be described as ‘the crisis of the aftermath.’ So far, it consists of several main strands: (1) how wide to draw the circle of criminality and civic responsibility with respect to the movement of Fetullah Gülen as operative in the government [as of July 19 almost 20,000 suspected members of FETÖ (Gülenist Terrorist Organization) have been suspended from army, judiciary, and police, which is additional to 7,453 suspects now detained that include 100 police officers, 6,038 soldiers, 755 prosecutors and judges, and 650 civilians]; there exists also a preoccupation with the prosecution of Fetullah Gülen himself, which depends on whether the United States can be persuaded to grant extradition; there are also present anxieties about a witch hunt being extended to all critics, especially the faculty of universities and media journalists; (2) the extent to which ‘democracy’ is being deliberately confused through the mobilization of ultra-nationalist populism mingled with calls in the nightly demonstrations in the public squares for Sharia governance; (3) the degree to which in a period of insecure borders, transnational terrorism, and a domestic insurgency the effectiveness and credibility of the Turkish armed forces can be restored; (4) the extent to which the call for restoring the death penalty with respect to the coup culprits will lead European Union to end Turkish accession talks, and how this will impact on Turkey’s NATO membership; (5) overall, how relations with the United States will be affected by the policies that are adopted by the government in this period of aftermath and with other states in the region.

 

It is worth observing two tendencies that cause in one instance hope and in the other deep concern. The hope arises from the unity that has so far been maintained as between the main opposition political party and the AKP built on the consensus that the coup operatives and supporters must be brought to justice, but without a spirit of revenge and in accordance with the rule of law. The concern arises in response to the sweeping dismissals, suspensions, and detentions of those in the civil service, educational system, and armed forces under the misleading banner of anti-terrorism. The Gülen movement certainly seems guilty of treason, and some acts of terrorism against

Innocent Turkish civilians, but it was a criminal undertaking to be differentiated from terrorism in the pattern of recent attacks in Nice, Dhaka, Orlando, or the Istanbul Airport.

 

Returning to my pre-coup conversation in Yalikavak I think again

of the view so prevalent among oppositional secularists that due to recent political developments, things in the country could not get any worse. What this failed coup demonstrated convincingly is that things could, and almost did, get a lot worse: a bloody military regime that would have needed to be harshly oppressive to deal with the massive civil resistance that would have certainly emerged, and probably producing an insurgent challenge taking the form of a civil war, possibly in the Syrian mode. With such a prospect in mind it was particularly encouraging that even the bitter CHP opposition to the AKP during these past 14 years realized from the outset of the coup attempt that its success would have been a disaster for the country far, far worse than the continuation of AKP governance.

 

There has now surfaced in this unsettled period of the aftermath a quite different set of concerns about things getting worse, that the experience of the coup will lead Erdoğan to seek and obtain further enhanced powers that enable him to purge public institutions, and even the private sector of all its opponents, which it should be realized, make up about 50% of the country. And as well, use his populist mandate to move the country further in an Islamic direction

so far as regulatory framework and cultural atmosphere are concerned.

 

It is not a matter of abandoning a critical stance, but it is a reminder of the critical importance of not exaggerating the negative features of a governing process as it undermines the coherence and credibility of political discourse. How can we even talk about conditions that are worse than what exists being already deemed to be ‘the worst’? In times of tension it is particularly important for the defense of what is good and identification of what would worsen the status quo, to strive for balanced assessments, always hoping for the best, while trying to identify and oppose any and all steps toward coercive authoritarianism. I have had the same reaction to conversations in the United States with friends who deem the country to have become ‘fascist.’ Surely, there have been disturbing tendencies, but to assert the actuality of fascism is to misunderstand its truly demonic reality.

 

9 Responses to “Narrating Turkey at a Time on National Crisis”

  1. Fred Skolnik July 20, 2016 at 4:35 am #

    As long as I’m here: Your remark re Turkey that “Surely, there have been disturbing tendencies, but to assert the actuality of fascism is to misunderstand its truly demonic reality,” is very reasonable and no doubt true. It is a shame that you don’t apply such scrupulous and fair-minded standards when you use the word with reference to Israel. And incidentally your disdain for the elegant and charming woman you had dinner with because she criticizes Erdogan’s Turkey while living in a beautiful home and enjoying a life of ease and comfort might be applied just as well to left-wing American academics in similar circumstances who have made subsidiary careers out of lambasting America. You are as always applying a double standard.

  2. Gene Schulman July 20, 2016 at 8:00 am #

    Richard,

    As usual, an excellent, informative, analysis of the situation in Turkey. I’m glad you’re safe and sound back in your own bed.

    But I can’t help sharing this rather dismal and scary assessment:
    http://www.counterpunch.org/2016/07/20/the-coup-in-turkey-has-thrown-a-wrench-in-uncle-sams-pivot-plan/ Scary, because uncertain. No telling what the US will do.

    G

  3. jonpiasente July 20, 2016 at 8:39 am #

    Hi Richard, thank you for this detailed summary. A few questions:
    1. Considering Fethullah Gulen has published books, articles, has his own website and regularly posts online videos explaining his thoughts in great detail.. What about him is ‘mysterious’?
    2. Considering Gulen and, it would be safe to say, the vast majority of his supporters within Turkey and around the world eschew violence and are dedicated to affecting change through non-violent, democratic, and legal means, how can their activity be labelled ‘terrorism’ (FETO), when this label is the definitive opposite of non-violent, democratic, and legal behaviour?
    3. Regarding your statement, ‘The Gülen movement certainly seems guilty of treason, and some acts of terrorism against innocent Turkish civilians..’ can you please comment on the possibility that Col. Levent Turkkan’s confession was coerced, and explain how a *global* civil movement, one that has been active for many decades, can be reduced to the recent acts of military personnel in Turkey; apparently based on, as at the time of your post, one uncorroborated, and potentially coerced, confession.

    Looking forward to your response.

  4. Long live Assad and shame on his enemies July 20, 2016 at 9:40 am #

    {and this despite the continued massive genocidal atrocities being carried out the Damascus regime against the Syrian people.}

    SHAME ON YOU LIAR. Down with ENEMIES OF DR. Bashar Al Assad
    including Erdugan, a Trojan horse for Israel and US terrorism in Syria and beyond who staged a coup to kill his opponents to improve his own political standing in Turkey by FORCE. He is NOT elected ‘leader’, rather he has forced himself to silence his opponents. US/Israel and their servant, Erdugan, has killed thousands of innocent people in Iraq, Libya and Syria.
    US/Israel must F*ck off from our region and death to ‘greater israel’ and its supporters.

  5. John Walsh July 20, 2016 at 1:10 pm #

    Richard, how does the dismissal of the University Dean’s and many government officials (including many in the Office of the Prime Minister) impact or change your assessment?

    • Richard Falk July 20, 2016 at 10:52 pm #

      John: the situation here is increasingly worrisome, although difficult to assess the genuine security threat. Clearly,
      we seem in the midst of what I call ‘the crisis of the aftermath,’ the outcome of which is still uncertain, but a happy
      ending seems less and less likely with each passing day.

  6. Vincent Di Stefano July 20, 2016 at 3:34 pm #

    How extraordinary that you were there. Thank you so much for this view from the inside.

  7. pabmarq July 23, 2016 at 5:26 am #

    API, NY July / 2016  Continued developing Genocide of Puerto Ricans within the US and on the Island, the Federal Government has sent a bill to the people of Puerto Rico, for $72 billion dollars! This is proof of the continued harassment and genocide of the culture that has only been amicable with the US.  The Puerto Rican people being presently oppressed by the US are now conciencious of this bogus collection tactic mentioned below harming the individual Puerto Ricans at this time within ….yahoo restricts volumn more at;API, Y March / 2016, Stop Puerto Rican Genocide by the United States of AmericaI am a Senior, Veteran, Father, Degreed, Married and Christian.  I would like to have the United States placed on notice for the unforgiving treatment of Puerto Ricans in the United States and on the island of Puerto Rico.  GENOCIDE – the deliberate killing of a large group of people, especially those of a particular ethnic group or nation (Puerto Rican, Puerto Rico Nationals, Puertorriquens, Boricuas)Puerto Ricans are US citizens and have many benefits for serving in the US military since 1925, many are College graduates and is an economy assimilated to the American way of life.  But millions of Puerto Ricans do not enjoy their US Constitutional Rights because they are Rights ignored or intentionally refused by ALL 50 States, when Puerto Ricans are purposely overlooked, ignored, given duress and coercion as standard behavior by Whites and now recently by the staffs by recent arrivals -many that are illegals or on temporary assignment placed intentionally by unscrupulous business and governmental agencies.  Puerto Ricans in turn are US citizens but only on paper but refused any benefits as; social security, Legal assistance, career advancement, hospitalizations, food coupons, police assistance and many, many benefits deserving by the US Citizens, SUS enior Citizens, and US Constitution. This extends into refusal of Veterans benefits and Rights., that is a very ruthless way to impose dominion on a FREE individual fighting FOR Americas own FREEDOM and Liberty?!The abusive administrations under the Presidency of George Bush, George Bush Jr., Clinton and Obama. Jeb Bush as Florida Governor in the State of Florida has also contributed to this treatment in Florida copied by Governor Crist and Scott. Their oppressive management are carried out by their co-horts claiming, “it’s for the countries good” or are rouge employees with racist, discriminatory, hateful tendencies that are never reprimanded and seem to retire with full benefits their inhumane behaviors.On the Island for the past twenty (20)years of insurmountable oppression policies has cut so many monetary funds, work grants , grants, fellowships and funding; that the Puerto Rican nation has had to make their own policies forced within a quick timeframe due to the ill-minded administrators within the US Government purposely-intentionally causing financial HARDSHIP, intentional havoc, chaos, impoverishment and impoverishment. The anti-monetary funding and hard cuts have been primarily forced onto widows, families and children’s that are already low income.  Many Engineering Graduates from Puerto Rico come to the US and have to work in sub-standard jobs supervised by recent arrived illegals, temporary residents with no education, these Puerto Ricans having a superior education, being Bilingual and having American character.  Many of these supervisors oppress these young educated students and knowingly have ruined their lives by these oppressive tactics and no-one in Government, States government nor Police force will assist them.We are seeing that we are in turn being oppressed in the United States of America and in the Island Nation of Puerto Rico by a plan devised by the above mentioned Presidents.  While Puerto Rico, Puerto Rican state-side residents contributes over $555billion to the US economy, the US government send only $3Billion to the island and does not contribute to the islands welfare nor its working class. The attitude of “Just enough to pay bills and “tough luck”.  While this same Government sends money to many, many Latin-American countries, communist countries, foreign countries without any citizenship nor guarantee of payback.  The joke is that, “all the money deserving Puerto Rico is sent automatically to any other country except Puerto Rico”.  The heavy handed collections on Puerto Ricans is well documented, in private business and/or IRS or State Revenue collections these groups use the worst behavior, coercion, and mafia tactics possible to steal ALL property, savings, retirements while giving amnesty to any other Latin-American Country residents for the same collections? The heavy handed mal practice on Puerto Ricans extends to placing negative data on their Credit bureau file, ruining their Credit worthiness, disallowing legal representation and adding extortion upon excessive fees – void of all provisions that are provided for them but are refused any assistance but a “too bad” attitude.We see this as an attempt to undo ALL the privilege’s Puerto Ricans have earned in the past and a Genocide practice type application of oppression, dominance, reprisals, impoverishment, hardship and disruption to ALL International Human and Civil Rights. These SHAMEFUL, SHAMELESS, AMORAL people need to be exposed and the GENOCIDE of Puerto Ricans has to STOP!  JOIN US WITH THE; IRS CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT, We found another IRS Agent snooping around our home, last week the State of Missouri sent us another bill for 2012taxes when we no longer live there, these people are racist, haters, all needing to go to jail for corruption! We know this is adding more and more duress, stress, emotional distress and financial impoverishment…when the wicked rule; the people mourn…Prov 37,[usurpian government -John Adams]… https://sites.google.com/site/sellswaplease2buyproperty/home    …a government that seizes property without any right. We have fled Missouri seeking legal help so they took our home, retirements and continue their extortion. There are no US Constitutional Rights, Civil Rights, Taxpayers Rights? http://www.petitiononline.com/tax/petition.html American abuse approved by the United States of America! https://sites.google.com/site/intercontinentalco

    On Wednesday, July 20, 2016 6:56 AM, Global Justice in the 21st Century wrote:

    #yiv7052889502 a:hover {color:red;}#yiv7052889502 a {text-decoration:none;color:#0088cc;}#yiv7052889502 a.yiv7052889502primaryactionlink:link, #yiv7052889502 a.yiv7052889502primaryactionlink:visited {background-color:#2585B2;color:#fff;}#yiv7052889502 a.yiv7052889502primaryactionlink:hover, #yiv7052889502 a.yiv7052889502primaryactionlink:active {background-color:#11729E;color:#fff;}#yiv7052889502 WordPress.com | Richard Falk posted: ” A night before the attempted coup of July 15th, in conversation with an elegant secular business leader and permacologist in the seaside town of Yalikavak I was surprised by the intensity of her negativity toward the government, expressed with beguil” | |

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Richard Falk: Narrating Turkey at a Time of National Crisis - Guernica / A Magazine of Art & Politics - July 25, 2016

    […] By Richard Falk By arrangement with Richard Falk […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: